Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Vincent Cheng Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 26 19:16:21 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.447 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4arM7ulstHsFN9CtOcpKGBxt+GCtPS86Doozoe1kGiM=; b=RoD4t80Uxn9wIPoNboK7hSsggpQcU5Ff1Ql4tXZM6kSp8o4GrepzH5tkU3aaKTnncP GjvVJKkBHMUWPAwno5ATteVl5MARskgXOSa6j0OtGqjxC0pZyHGkRK4Bz+OWgvnejjsn JWusab630NM5D2l5GS0WzTX0ONbU/lzpMlkUB1RA3+k0W6dP6iHFCjMHj7nsQq5VFvvN aNmf6x8orcQ5gknLJmhE3orE07mYC8urdqxIiqRpLPrnBq3hxfOSR2QnvRCk3GshXWOq sR8dIpJFt90Yh4jyM4GKfdloBRZ8tnDLq4K0r+Er7wF2V14OV7akbnl03gvfDgVW+yhY C+Fg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.219.39 with SMTP id pl7mr62347834pac.88.1448565366299; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:16:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9gp4VvP34mKO78jnfzYzCWaM0yQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13226 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CACZd_tAfTnwVrduRsR89udXi8nnwy74NuiSMH4F+ozcdJGbu4A@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 34 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:16:06 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <56534968.3000507@debian.org> <20151123205458.GB16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <56549EC0.7040205@debian.org> <20151124182903.GF16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <5654E438.404@debian.org> <20151124230008.GG16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <5654F7DA.4080802@debian.org> <20151125110750.GH16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <565719F0.6060909@debian.org> <20151126150204.GO16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <20151126150946.GP16403@sar0.p1otr.com> X-Original-Sender: vincentc1208@gmail.com Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7911 Hi Piotr, On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Piotr O=C5=BCarowski wr= ote: > [Piotr O=C5=BCarowski, 2015-11-26] >> that's the first mistake most backporters do, they forgot to include ori= g tarball >> (ftp masters would detect that and reject your package, additional work = for them) >> >> solution: pass -sa to dpkg-source ("--force-orig-source" in sbuild or "-= -debbuildopts -sa" in pbuilder) No, that's not necessary as long as the orig tarball is already present in the archive in another suite (which would be true for backports, since the package is supposed to be derived from the current version in testing). > the second one is missing changelog items and your packages have this one= too. > > solution: pass -vFOO to dpkg-source (where FOO is version in stable) > ("--force-orig-source --debbuildopt -vFOO" in sbuild and > "--debbuildopts '-sa -vFOO'" in pbuilder) No, the -v flag is no longer required as of April of this year [1]. It is merely "recommended" now [2]. Regards, Vincent [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-announce/2015/04/msg00000.htm= l [2] http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index7h3