Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7930

Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)
Date Sun, 29 Nov 2015 01:50:02 +0100
Message-ID <qzYlI-7El-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qzGRQ-58S-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzS6B-3Sw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzWMV-6Qr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzXfX-707-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzY2l-7wl-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Nov 29 00:49:05 2015
Old-Return-Path <debian@kitterman.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.212 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM=0.888] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .kitterman. - helo: .mailout03.controlledmail. - helo-domain: .controlledmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1448758127; bh=TRIZ6DMqYYBUOEXvneTbFq0Shwydx8gnaxZmYP8NSUQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From; b=AswaqAOYqqAB8XnSMflF+huJOHuFaKu3MrhNA7/4c0QcbBtLWJRCrhd/DipVPgx7Z dD2i/n2M8wj2fM+jaze8ZISbFtI8QffOZIaNvD0qAqSYRRElyq3Fz/p3G7oQ2oNCpv nboOcS0t4/1N0De5tTKuiPKbcatrM1XreVdyOGZE=
User-Agent K-9 Mail for Android
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13246
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/11AD14AF-1D43-4475-BB6E-F3FB46D5270B@kitterman.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 43
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sat, 28 Nov 2015 19:48:44 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID <11AD14AF-1D43-4475-BB6E-F3FB46D5270B@kitterman.com>
X-Original-References <87two6k65n.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <20151128180936.GA3495@mitya57.me> <87zixxiv3g.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <85h9k58zsr.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <87r3j9iriy.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7930

Show key headers only | View raw



On November 28, 2015 7:21:57 PM EST, Brian May <bam@debian.org> wrote:
>Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:
>
>> API/ABI transitions (such as switching default Python 3 to be PYthon
>> 3.5) are managed by the release team, with a workflow described at
>> <URL:https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions>.
>
>There is https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html
>
>Still trying to work out what the "Dependency level n" headers mean.
>
>What are the implications of the "Collisions" section? Looks like
>packages in multiple transitions.
>
>Are the orange packages a problem or not? So if the build is failing on
>a platform it will get an orange status as well as if it doesn't meet
>the good or bad criteria.
>
>If I understand this correctly, all packages as part of the transition
>get uploaded to experimental, and then get moved at once to unstable?
>
>Unfortunately the
>https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html page doesn't
>indicate if somebody is already working on the package or not.
>
>I would have thought binNMU would be sufficient for some of these
>packages, however maybe these easy targets have already been fixed now?
>
>> Have a read through the log for bug#798999 and see whether they're
>> waiting on something we can help with.
>
>Not that I can see. So maybe that means any of the red packages on the
>transition tracking page.
>
>Some of the packages look like they are broken with no immediate fix,
>maybe should get removed from unstable *if* inclusion in unstable is
>holding up the transition. e.g. openturns.

We haven't started the transition yet.  When it starts, binNMU should be enough for most of the packages.

Scott K

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz> - 2015-11-28 07:10 +0100
  Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2015-11-28 19:10 +0100
    Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 00:10 +0100
      Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is  Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that  requires 3.5) Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-29 00:40 +0100
        Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3  is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python  that requires 3.5) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 01:30 +0100
          Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-11-29 01:50 +0100
            Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3  is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python  that requires 3.5) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 02:50 +0100

csiph-web