Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7930
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) |
| Date | Sun, 29 Nov 2015 01:50:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qzYlI-7El-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qzGRQ-58S-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzS6B-3Sw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzWMV-6Qr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzXfX-707-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzY2l-7wl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Nov 29 00:49:05 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debian@kitterman.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.212 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM=0.888] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .kitterman. - helo: .mailout03.controlledmail. - helo-domain: .controlledmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1448758127; bh=TRIZ6DMqYYBUOEXvneTbFq0Shwydx8gnaxZmYP8NSUQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From; b=AswaqAOYqqAB8XnSMflF+huJOHuFaKu3MrhNA7/4c0QcbBtLWJRCrhd/DipVPgx7Z dD2i/n2M8wj2fM+jaze8ZISbFtI8QffOZIaNvD0qAqSYRRElyq3Fz/p3G7oQ2oNCpv nboOcS0t4/1N0De5tTKuiPKbcatrM1XreVdyOGZE= |
| User-Agent | K-9 Mail for Android |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13246 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/11AD14AF-1D43-4475-BB6E-F3FB46D5270B@kitterman.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 43 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sat, 28 Nov 2015 19:48:44 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <11AD14AF-1D43-4475-BB6E-F3FB46D5270B@kitterman.com> |
| X-Original-References | <87two6k65n.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <20151128180936.GA3495@mitya57.me> <87zixxiv3g.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <85h9k58zsr.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <87r3j9iriy.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7930 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On November 28, 2015 7:21:57 PM EST, Brian May <bam@debian.org> wrote: >Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes: > >> API/ABI transitions (such as switching default Python 3 to be PYthon >> 3.5) are managed by the release team, with a workflow described at >> <URL:https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions>. > >There is https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html > >Still trying to work out what the "Dependency level n" headers mean. > >What are the implications of the "Collisions" section? Looks like >packages in multiple transitions. > >Are the orange packages a problem or not? So if the build is failing on >a platform it will get an orange status as well as if it doesn't meet >the good or bad criteria. > >If I understand this correctly, all packages as part of the transition >get uploaded to experimental, and then get moved at once to unstable? > >Unfortunately the >https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html page doesn't >indicate if somebody is already working on the package or not. > >I would have thought binNMU would be sufficient for some of these >packages, however maybe these easy targets have already been fixed now? > >> Have a read through the log for bug#798999 and see whether they're >> waiting on something we can help with. > >Not that I can see. So maybe that means any of the red packages on the >transition tracking page. > >Some of the packages look like they are broken with no immediate fix, >maybe should get removed from unstable *if* inclusion in unstable is >holding up the transition. e.g. openturns. We haven't started the transition yet. When it starts, binNMU should be enough for most of the packages. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz> - 2015-11-28 07:10 +0100
Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2015-11-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 00:10 +0100
Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-29 00:40 +0100
Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 01:30 +0100
Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-11-29 01:50 +0100
Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 02:50 +0100
csiph-web