Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Barry Warsaw Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python Policy Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Oct 21 13:55:07 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, CAPINIT=0.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5 Organization: The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/OVx71ct=J0mF9hxzr1Ua=gU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13049 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151021095449.61eca73c@limelight.wooz.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 44 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:54:49 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151021095449.61eca73c@limelight.wooz.org> X-Original-References: <20151019133137.6174ef07@limelight.wooz.org> <20151019212639.GF3846@p1otr.com> <20151020165359.69f44eae@limelight.wooz.org> <5626AD5E.8000900@debian.org> <85y4exoz0u.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <56274402.3080504@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7737 --Sig_/OVx71ct=J0mF9hxzr1Ua=gU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct 21, 2015, at 09:51 AM, IOhannes m zm=C3=B6lnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: >i am not a native speaker. so i might get things wrong. >but i'm not the only non-native English speaker in Debian. >therefore, i *strongly* suggest that the policy should be written in a >style that non-natives can understand it - without getting the >impression that considerable parts of the policy are only relevant for >specific setups (and not for them). I'm a native English speaker and I completely agree. Thanks for pointing o= ut instances where the wording is unclear. Hopefully, the latest changes (see previous follow up) are both more concise and coherent. Cheers, -Barry --Sig_/OVx71ct=J0mF9hxzr1Ua=gU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWJ5kpAAoJEBJutWOnSwa/XAoQAIQtCSCIXYSlFrsQR3ajCJ8V sKp9vydEawJTH3b73kBcYIniwBD+VSedeavV/4dwMQFDz43gZ1/XdMKjHfeSCbpj BqgaHPkOY+q7RSXRBSl3uzo0FR3ut5iswunbnfdJpgHJAmwrECqSRwzmoGfmxRmB R1ykecZlXOsslXRyjITXNPwy+uOXpxGwYP6EknkeJ0/9YLwZkOF9yRPtnwouCj4i eFGkVCMYVObA8wXe1F2ZQG+krXli8yOxOEnDKdPv+gDEipx3zvdcl2iBR2eu5bmI v3JA8huPg8oBIwVfLys+avsmzcT6GmAOKgPndeSnZ2TScDvJXRiSv5Qu0qLptUnE /pE9gNgLExynhpj/kaFqOfg4d9PtZfFk++sGbZWKBCCPBJHPloDJC9Pvshe77qSo 8KcMWnSqAC4N29+kV2JYqoPT25phVSWJVI7bYcnwhYWmPezsyHNcC5IhPBp/S3qI cYIRnZr/mVMtmjkGYf2HojP7QfVNEgOIhkqsOWc3WGGgneFYbGlrPiTdi2d3AEkf qLpZLfzOh248bILbqZJ6efVpYP54a1YonqdJ14ZcaommDSYNbVAtyjicgtwuN8C9 cg767EZtvaYkMtS2qKlZFOpuo2Kj0bHpptVwz1XqO6oG3mGUIKp09DU+dZF334a9 FDwmwlcUXQlyOjvJsoV5 =NpgG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/OVx71ct=J0mF9hxzr1Ua=gU--