Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Barry Warsaw Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-django Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 10 17:45:09 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, ONEWORD=2] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 Organization: The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12910 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151010134450.168269b4@limelight.wooz.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 20 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:44:50 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151010134450.168269b4@limelight.wooz.org> X-Original-References: <20151010071336.GA6376@home.ouaza.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7599 On Oct 10, 2015, at 09:13 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >Yes, except for the naming of branches where I would prefer to keep the >DEP-14 naming scheme (we should just rename debian/sid into debian/master). > >http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/ > >And I would suggest that we generalize the DEP-14 naming scheme as part of >our git packaging policy... I'm all for standardization, but I do like the shorter names for the common case where you only need the unstable version. Certainly if there are vendor or series differences, the namespaces make a lot of sense. But most of my packages don't need it. Would you be open to allowing such simplification in the common case in DEP-14? Cheers, -Barry