Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Brian May Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:50:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Scott Kitterman , debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 6 00:43:06 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .microcomaustralia. - helo: .mail-ig0-x22c.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=eD3oIHiGAJAM+OCf65YpkZxbBmt7eMfzpLGycZUAGjM=; b=I00tLRnfXAzJCisqnra/qwXI7PgdHWUXM/yBb8zXjSi3oSskSCukM57cw0ZnQ0kBQ6 1tYeEZfC3+w4AZhrEhZCoXwNVd9V/zg2Ityq1f38jvQ1KV4WQz5GmJ3U6aYrGAMUrkIs po1S0LgVLC+JcyOelB9Wz7RgaJj4dpg3PGtuk= X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=eD3oIHiGAJAM+OCf65YpkZxbBmt7eMfzpLGycZUAGjM=; b=S3Ewv7DQex0mHXCYT8Wmeg40HfsQrHL/AY6v9JEBk5nsVQaQIDZVPkIMj7gCoeINgu i/MP9p04sPgs3zV1p47xe6r2gqK+aA+oKh7z7i5Vm4cgbJAU/9qkbzm//YiFeSDwS1RA 7UgJU/sWc6hEQHbNE2gAr4HAhxcCyWFbFc0OFsrtP/b9vG8ftGcPZXvh/4U6ZDOTiGY9 E7jGeXinw6dUKJ8UCKh6rK4/MA+y/TVFkwefdAB6JPwiloUyrX5w74Qupbv+XSVczNHJ elizh9PIZkoaHV0TsICuwvCeWnboVSCxDO7rTaBS6a88Y/FFhbbjDWCAp9has213J+Fp X8hw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlLaS3bo6nh7KCEdwjcO114IMfpg1tJcl1VNg7m0CvNj8DImHl4F5iq8sciuLRaLRDbQk+Q X-Received: by 10.50.85.102 with SMTP id g6mr10056162igz.74.1444092169935; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 17:42:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01495030cffce2052164e862 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12800 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAA0ZO6A0XJhbAvS_NnS_Esf-vOeDwXMBfQDThG6LX2iE1gDHFQ@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 39 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:42:40 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <206296351.XFVvngxEbP@kitterma-e6430> <5612EF95.5050505@debian.org> <1785308.87PpurXeRK@kitterma-e6430> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7489 --089e01495030cffce2052164e862 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 09:33 Scott Kitterman wrote: > Except in this case you not only didn't but then got defensive when called > on it. If you'd just reacted with something like "Oops, made a mistake, > I'll > revert it from svn and ask for it to be removed from experimental." > (fortunately for experimental we can do that) then this wouldn't have been > a big deal. > I get the impression that the complaint was "process wasn't followed" as opposed to "I didn't want that package in experimental". So unless I am mistaken, there doesn't seem to be any need to remove the package from experimental. In this particular case. --089e01495030cffce2052164e862 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 09:33 Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
Except in this case you= not only didn't but then got defensive when called on it.=C2=A0 If you= 'd just reacted with something like "Oops, made a mistake, I'l= l
revert it from svn and ask for it to be removed from experimental." (fortunately for experimental we can do that) then this wouldn't have b= een a big deal.

I get the impression th= at the complaint was "process wasn't followed" as opposed to = "I didn't want that package in experimental". So unless I am = mistaken, there doesn't seem to be any need to remove the package from = experimental. In this particular case.
--089e01495030cffce2052164e862--