Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Scott Kitterman Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 6 00:12:20 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1444090323; bh=RudUIxm81ASNvIYQQ8zSkAbjeEcIG8nsdB1KsQAWeG4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From; b=vBsHI/ZzRtKWY8heQDuhUKCYEJq0ef+7en9Z1BrEiAwO65R1V16yb/I2U+nXz1R6t aINszgOvIk6b81v5lIyBrxIqfdyRLX+QJ1wWVEO1/VyxIuPy6nGX5k3lGu5IUyXWyW 1SBsPqdaA+ZkKrm9FOs8RhVKh8naEr2cWuK/z1U4= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12798 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/A800C899-72E5-49A3-BE02-C89F005B0212@kitterman.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 29 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:12:01 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <206296351.XFVvngxEbP@kitterma-e6430> <5612EF95.5050505@debian.org> <1785308.87PpurXeRK@kitterma-e6430> <561301A2.1060203@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7487 On October 5, 2015 7:02:58 PM EDT, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 10/06/2015 12:33 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Technically right, but socially wrong is wrong. > >I got that point, yes. > >> Reading that and what you >> wrote above, does that help you understand why I question both your >focus and >> the sincerity of your expressions of regret. > >The words that I'm reading from you here are humiliating: it implies >that I would be ready to write anything, including not being sincere in >my apologies, just to beg for still being a team member. > >This last Sunday, I got upset about all of this all day even if I >didn't >want to think about it, to the point my belly was hurting, and I >couldn't spend a good time with my kids. > >Now, reading this, I want to puke... I don't think you're intentionally malicious. I think you're just too wrapped up in it to see it clearly. As I said up thread, I think a break from the team will be helpful for you to re-engage productively. Scott K