Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Mattia Rizzolo Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 5 21:17:17 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.38 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YSZOHbuLteOfUK0sHkhC+08rMII5sRAurdHY0a27NF4=; b=phdU61VxMF0/idTdoz+aBP7aFnJsuTgkmYnjmRtEwv0SoBt27sIlvtjJoaDurmLyqa kprjoXJrbLnB8FPJ2603lbJBTVw/z1YwYVWDhzFGwKBDsI/JIczorAb2B3XuZwME+NcH kCKh3uZwsbLfODu1cPAhog6qra8Taek+LTu1xuE4hTU6fIVl0ElbnYEj3+ToMQSWt8m/ mQ+UYjwuyNGpYazYlCmdPOtf8WprJ6MEQCvEj9FwaWVIN97Q3+l1QNZMgmpasJHmJgul kFwAOP90zcR7B3APtoAXluLEgP37xJjiTv/jGhOveQpyq/PDfAINdBx9v/u3mUQ+BxYx 1+2Q== X-Received: by 10.194.246.42 with SMTP id xt10mr32415032wjc.11.1444079822264; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj" Content-Disposition: inline X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: Linux, kernel 4.2.0-1-amd64, inside Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid) sid. X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Outlook sucks. A lot. User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12785 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151005211658.GB10362@chase.mapreri.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 72 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:16:58 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151005211658.GB10362@chase.mapreri.org> X-Original-References: <20150929094816.69da6b32@limelight.wooz.org> <560BA2F3.2080407@debian.org> <561228AC.3090103@debian.org> <5612724E.9060007@debian.org> <20151005171126.783f9e4a@limelight.wooz.org> X-Original-Sender: Mattia Rizzolo Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7474 --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:11:26PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 05, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >=20 > >In other distributions (Red Hat and Ubuntu), everyone is aware of this > >kind of issue before uploading, and this kinds of things don't happen. >=20 > Ubuntu at least does have a technical solution that helps ameliorate > archive-wide breakages, and that is -proposed migration. When you upload > e.g. to wily, it gets diverted to wily-proposed and to get promoted it ha= s to > pass a number of tests. The package and their reverses have to build. D= EP-8 > tests have to pass, etc. You can get a nice report about which -proposed > promotions are failing: >=20 > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_exc= uses.html >=20 > The downside is that you should probably be proactively checking this list > (poll vs ping) and it can sometimes be difficult to figure out why a prom= otion > fails or how to fix it. >=20 > But this does mean that the archive itself is very rarely broken, and it = can > be a convenient way to stage package updates that may have effects in par= ts of > the archive you might not be aware of. Isn't this the whole point of unstable=E2=86=92testing? Ok, the debian testing migration might do really few checks compared to ubuntu's, but still it's the same thing, and I believe RT would like to add more checks (at lest dep-8 tests) someday. --=20 regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dmattia `- --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWEujJAAoJEEsEP825REVAFE8P/1pBEmAdYJdO6KVvadz8e+H3 jvJfVEz/2tWbb+sCy1DnUuSSvai8tXQcQCyi8vAuorX8A8g8IUYZBuysWmBNRURf +gPoZ1j7gAV96AqJRRvVGYBmEDCKEokNSdmFeANNRnhCeD1KwTqQPSaTJx72IXvK bhtbTKp14K0pr4E9aIUQrPjVYmv/6iKbxf5yAaOaYr7lFBH4yYM4J0tMcjxI3vsL DSGpeGI8MVrrNoFheAU1UyfU0JJ60AZeyFBDCTigoPjZ9aqfA9ImJDTSE+ppc2HN 797JA7FnegLnq3HaifMRbiMjbpl3q1gTJi8DiNnGHtbm/b881AALGUBpRnFQZenj J+QvrmXWWwBKhJphFi9lk4tkvjWj3jTJdtRx0L45dmBAmni1iXdEkv6a/pjfLqaT 1yf+GH6Tdn/AyfF/jpUn18+P0vaSvnE3ewFC3BNgy++FadRGc3/ujtNZ/4/tUEYv e1UIG5hQPzhb9JrLeJFZ+QuADmLyCOw46fqin++eH/6SjlPWiiLgB5M3gRPdfQLl 9BbZov+1dLw41whvnQz8jaXIBapRwHnpMQe/aFvp9dMRbVxJjHhqXxPs4tWVrTFY dK14ka07jeuCObWsU24puQv2vvJL3AzSg7efX9Kyx+CZleO45oIMuXJOrlvb8KES ACznUGx9oQlm9XgqW/0K =e+xz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj--