Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Mattia Rizzolo Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: managing transitions Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 17:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 6 15:00:46 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RLmPu2hpC+PVA/6dJl1Y9JSmaOC1zBMDH9HrZKJQba4=; b=0/H1VlC3iV1VJdOB6Szbi5XoCzxgvptciS4hE7Npfhs9kv0PpoQ/lluuZ3j7vTFiVE SrM/2I7HZbEu7BwS7UzJoBvI5of5GKZHegGliZgAdmybUqN0LZc5LbzMld2G+3Xcs6aF YKzZZOrO2wl7CDBeewOGFGZr+YIQiDgUQT76zk/U9dyIasNYFdm5jyFnLTAPKXkfbfzR FvdGeqgLyMFeh+qyG8oWumM8815Pqvc2rb9Rrn9IdRTxxtHh5oxYX9GvfWEwtc/+ohdp G4hz+LaC0ahtX71bTOfHrBmvQz1pk44mMKNOEFPtJX41LdpXmvkqOJkx9rdV0xxD9U38 jjYQ== X-Received: by 10.194.23.2 with SMTP id i2mr36735979wjf.106.1444143616519; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs" Content-Disposition: inline X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: Linux, kernel 4.2.0-1-amd64, inside Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid) sid. X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Outlook sucks. A lot. User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12819 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151006150012.GB21889@chase.mapreri.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 79 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:00:12 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151006150012.GB21889@chase.mapreri.org> X-Original-References: <20150929094816.69da6b32@limelight.wooz.org> <560BA2F3.2080407@debian.org> <561228AC.3090103@debian.org> <5612724E.9060007@debian.org> <20151005171126.783f9e4a@limelight.wooz.org> <56137C24.8040204@debian.org> <20151006110252.GA18105@chase.mapreri.org> <5613D4CA.2010707@debian.org> X-Original-Sender: Mattia Rizzolo Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7508 --5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/06/2015 01:02 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:39:48AM +0000, Brian May wrote: > >> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> > >>> This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review system (and not > >>> just Git) which could do tests on each change of a package even before > >>> having them committed to our git. > >>> > >> > >> Sounds like an interesting thing to discuss/test after we move to git.= =2E. > >=20 > > Moreover, jenkins.debian.org is happening right about now, guess it > > would help quite something (and I'd be happy to host such tests there). >=20 > I don't think a single machine is enough for this kind of workload. > Imagine the upload of a new setuptools and rebuilding all packages > build-depending on it. That's a lot of packages to rebuild in > jenkins.d.o. I have offers from some cloud providers which we could use > instead for this kind of job. We "only" need to do the work... jenkins.d.o won't build anything but only keep the master node (without builders, or maybe one or two to do maintenance stuff). If what you would like to do is to "just" rebuild all rdeps, that's really one of the thing I'd really like to do, it just takes time do all the work (and atm I'm busy doing other stuff, if that wasn't clear) :) To be precise, what I plan is to really improve the current reproducible.d.n scripts and base everything on them. I'd like to support both rebuilds on a modified toolchain on demand and on all r-deps of a particular packages which uploads would act as a trigger. It just takes a shitload of time I don't currently have, as usual. Currently there are means to ask for rebuild of stuff using a particular packages (through the AWS credit, managed by lucas & I-don't-remember-who), but to me it looks like it's not really used if not for big packages (like, before gcc uploads), and the results are somewhat difficult to access and understand and often used by a single person, which sucks. --=20 regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dmattia `- --5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWE+H8AAoJEEsEP825REVAmfgP/RHB39ngkCnBf8/fRwxvJchN EQac3p/Lhs1HOkRGCjaVacI2XKzxshTwtTxljJcqzXquoVs0dP/+mGB3kUhY+aHD sdy3du8oLYX/voatZz+/wEs5zc+eOAbF5QlRnt1jiiVA5PcJ1RfkbqDlgT7UrVLV 2xQsyopSy1TIMtswhrvK0XesfbcgJq2paHcI+hW7jaTBmaetYsjP8HBIA7xd+1Xh kayPO8FwtWG6NWjNx5fnLs2goHOKtpPeTHMU2sIBR4p/I4mG6R0QBNLzYC2jY96r xPMuxpJ3OrDqjeHZjEzSH7wvk7FZv37rPr7Se+eQeDd7U4RKDH+P9ltJGBwN7q3L Cl6i8wRna5EQ7Mj4lo6tTmQem3H7Mdu+nJol4CBVdrV/PHXxqEzBMegGusD2WyEd in43oSX3sLy7CYZIv5/FuFWJdkoGiTqyPlt43JgDJ7SDhf78fsNrM0gEFuc1kLty 73YvhaJO4q1YQy0yluAV1DIaFX3N+9lz9blo/kyPGV4gA61Ewa8oB6jes+h1I580 adf2May8sN5T6sFev8qv0/AmdHuqC7RQ1MdvQQKOwxdVICKJNY8ohd+JZ6HPxBxH OkSH/DUXBCUzKV0efH4tne/kvvHQXdvO1BMu8eIQOm5+/f+Fkx9hW/bJrR+xTrU+ yaC5tbkqaDbKeUe7veX2 =uIJQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs--