Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Pierre-Elliott =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9cue?= <becue@crans.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: I've been removed from the Python team
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:50:01 +0200
Message-ID: <qfwil-4KR-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <qevy1-6hR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeQ9s-39m-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeQCu-3Wq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeUPL-1B8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfvcB-3eS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfvPj-4dk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <becue@crans.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 27
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7438

On sam. 03 oct. 2015 à 16:15:53, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2015-10-03]
> > Yes, do-it-o-craty is good, at some point, but this is exactly what brought
> > Thomas out. So nope, it's not enough.
> 
> and if I didn't do it, it would be better because...
> It's easy to point fingers if it's not you who cleans after each mess.

You didn't get my point. As previously said, I heard and understood your
answer, I'm not trying to going back on what I said. But this new argument
about doitocraty VS. democracy is something interesting to discuss about.

I was meaning that Thomas probably acted as a doitocraty recommends to, and
that's what led to this situation, with him out of the team.

I beleive there is a need to create some democratic processes in a team,
that's all.

> /me (AKA dictator who'd love to give all his powers to someone else) who
> still stands by his decision and would do it again.
> The only regret is that I didn't do it a year ago.

I'm not able to judge on this, as I'm not aware of all the stories, neither
do I have enough experience.

-- 
PEB