Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:30:02 +0200
Message-ID: <qesqu-1Sg-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <qe1gC-53J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe1gC-53J-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe3s8-85D-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qelp1-8sJ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qelS2-Ol-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qemO8-2bO-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <qen7r-2yO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qerkK-kW-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <sandro.tosi@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 26
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7380

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 12:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> He knew it violated team norms and just didn't care.
>
> That's not what I wrote.
>
> I went into packages.d.o, saw DPMT, and a bit too fast, thought it was
> team maintained and that an upload would be accepted. Yes, I knew the
> rule, but no I didn't just ignore it. I was just confused by looking too
> fast, and seeing DPMT in the package.
>
> Write the rule into the stones of a policy wont fix it, such mistake may
> happen again.

you mean taht again you will "look too fast" the maintainer and go on
with your agenda? lintian reported

W: python-networkx source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: python-networkx source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.10-1

not even that was an alert for you?

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi