Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7364

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

From Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Date 2015-09-30 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <qelIl-CS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qe1gC-53J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe1gC-53J-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe3s8-85D-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <qelp1-8sJ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 03:48 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>
>>> Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored
>>>
>>> either policy changes or this has to stop at some point.
>>
>> A few observations.
>>
>> The policy should perhaps be better promoted or more explicitly written.  The
>> links you provided are useful, but I wonder whether they are easily
>> overlooked, forgotten, or misinterpreted.
>
> I knew the rule. However, I looked too fast. In this case, I just saw
> "DPMT", and though hum... let's upload, to experimental, it's not a big
> deal, especially that *not other package* depending on it are in
> Experimental, so there was no risk to break anything (yes, I did check
> for this before uploading). Seems I was wrong, and Sandro does make it a
> huge deal.

yes you are wrong, and you keep ignoring both the team policy and the
debian policy as well
(https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-maintainer)
because that serves your interests better this way

> If you think some of my changes are, let me know (I'm sure you also

look to previous replies.

> noticed some good changes which corrected issues from version 1.9.1-1).
> However, let's try to do discuss in a nice way. Finger-pointing is
> pointless loss of time for everyone.
>
> IMO, Sandro, please just relax. It's not as if I broke everything. It's
> just that the debian/changelog stayed for one full month untouched, with
> a single entry from you "New upstream release" and nothing more. So I
> did the work. No need to start a troll thread for this. This has driven

NO! so you should have asked what's going on

> some contributors away in the past, thinking we don't have team spirit.
> IMO, that's truth, and this kind of thread is hurting again.
>
> On 09/29/2015 03:48 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> Should we have some automated tools to help out here?
>
> If we had Gerrit with the correct ACLs, it would certainly help.

I would say that an email client works best, as that's the tool you
use to contact other maintainers

> On 09/29/2015 03:48 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> Something like that would go a long way toward mitigating accidental
>> or careless toe-stepping.
>
> I don't agree with the "careless" here.
>
> What's IMO important is to care not to break any other package in the
> archive, and this is *not* addressed by package ownership. In fact, it's
> rather the opposite way: the package ownership culture in Debian is in
> many ways breaking stability. Let me give some examples.
>
> * P1otr broke multiple times many of my OpenStack key packages by
> uploading newer versions of SQLAlchemy without giving enough time to fix
> issues, even though the SQLAlchemy upstream main author works for RedHat
> specifically on OpenStack support.
>
> * The maintainer of mock uploaded version 1.3 to Sid, which created RC
> bugs (FTBFS) on maybe more than 20 packages currently in Sid, even
> though upstream (Robert Collins) is employed by HP and knew OpenStack
> Kilo (currently in Sid) would break with his new changes.

so long for "Finger-pointing is pointless loss of time for everyone."
just a few lines above..

> This was careless. And to this, I have no say, because the package
> maintainer decides, and whoever uploads the higher version always wins.
> I could even find more examples if you ask...
>
> However, when I upload python-netowrkx in Experimental, where absolutely
> no package depending on it resides, it's an issue, and then I'm called
> "careless", just because someone "owns" the package and feels like I
> stepped on his toes. That, even considering that I'm reaching the
> bi-annual release of OpenStack, on which I worked days and nights for
> the last 6 months, and I really needed that upload to make sure I have
> the same version of the components that upstream is testing against (ie:

yeah that's it, you care only about pkg-openstack and has no interest
to be a member of this team (as it's proved by the fact you keep
uploading general-purposes python modules under pkg-openstak umbrella)
and popping up here only when you need something for OS, clearly not
caring to follow up if something is not working in one of your
changes.

> last version of python-taskflow, itself needed by Cinder and Glance,
> needed networkx 1.10).
>
> IMO, we have a *very* serious problem here, which isn't even bound to
> the Python team. We should IMO rethink our workflow and rules, and the
> way we think about the Debian archive. Not just thinking about our own
> little square of fenced garden.

well, you decided to use unstable/experimental for your OS work, so
this is what you get. either you adapt your workflow or stop
complaining about a not working integration when sid purpose is
completely another.

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 13:30 +0200
  Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 13:50 +0200
  Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@logilab.fr> - 2015-09-29 14:00 +0200
    Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 14:20 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 10:20 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 10:50 +0200
    Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-29 14:30 +0200
  Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 15:50 +0200
    Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 10:50 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2015-09-30 14:10 +0200
    Maintainer vs. Uploaders Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
      Re: Maintainer vs. Uploaders Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 20:40 +0200
      Re: Maintainer vs. Uploaders Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 11:30 +0200
    Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 20:40 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 20:50 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-29 21:00 +0200
            lintian and team uploads Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 21:50 +0200
              Re: lintian and team uploads Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 22:00 +0200
                Re: lintian and team uploads Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-29 22:40 +0200
                Re: lintian and team uploads Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 22:50 +0200
                Re: lintian and team uploads Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-30 05:00 +0200
                Re: lintian and team uploads Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-30 05:00 +0200
                git migration (AKA missing old good svn days) Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-09-29 23:10 +0200
                Re: git migration (AKA missing old good svn days) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 00:00 +0200
                Re: git migration (AKA missing old good svn days) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-30 05:00 +0200
                Re: git migration (AKA missing old good svn days) Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 07:40 +0200
                Re: git migration (AKA missing old good svn days) Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2015-10-03 11:40 +0200
    Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 11:00 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 11:20 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 17:30 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 17:50 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk> - 2015-09-30 11:30 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 12:30 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 12:50 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 17:30 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 17:50 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 18:10 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 18:40 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 12:50 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-30 13:10 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-30 12:50 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 17:20 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-09-30 18:30 +0200
      Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Michael Fladischer <fladi@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 10:00 +0200
        Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 15:00 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-05 17:00 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 23:30 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 23:50 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-06 00:40 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 01:10 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-06 02:20 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 09:30 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-06 13:50 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 15:40 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 18:30 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 22:50 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 23:40 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-07 15:40 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> - 2015-10-07 23:50 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-08 00:10 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 11:00 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-10-06 11:20 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> - 2015-10-06 02:50 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-06 03:40 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 13:30 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Sandro Tosi <sandro.tosi@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 13:40 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2015-10-06 03:30 +0200
                Re: mock 1.2 breaking tests (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes  ACCEPTED into experimental) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 09:30 +0200
                Re: mock 1.2 breaking tests (was:  python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental) Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2015-10-06 16:00 +0200
                Re: mock 1.2 breaking tests (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes  ACCEPTED into experimental) Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 17:50 +0200
                Re: mock 1.2 breaking tests Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 19:10 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> - 2015-10-05 20:10 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 23:20 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 09:40 +0200
          Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 23:20 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-10-05 23:20 +0200
              Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-05 23:30 +0200
                Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-10-05 23:50 +0200
            Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-05 23:30 +0200
            Re: managing transitions (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes  ACCEPTED into experimental) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 09:50 +0200
              Re: managing transitions (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes  ACCEPTED into experimental) Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> - 2015-10-06 10:50 +0200
                Re: managing transitions (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes  ACCEPTED into experimental) Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-10-06 13:10 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 16:10 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org> - 2015-10-06 17:10 +0200
                Re: managing transitions (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes  ACCEPTED into experimental) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 17:50 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 19:10 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 20:20 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Fred Drake <fred@fdrake.net> - 2015-10-06 21:20 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-06 21:30 +0200
                Re: managing transitions Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 21:30 +0200

csiph-web