Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Piotr =?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: git migration (AKA missing old good svn days) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:10:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 29 21:05:38 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux (3.16.0-4-amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12665 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20150929210519.GN6768@sar0.p1otr.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 26 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:05:19 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20150929210519.GN6768@sar0.p1otr.com> X-Original-References: <20150929094816.69da6b32@limelight.wooz.org> <20150929154019.GA12153@cauchy.localdomain> <20150929143259.51738a6b@anarchist.wooz.org> <20150929184011.GL6768@sar0.p1otr.com> <20150929185221.GA22905@cauchy.localdomain> <20150929194602.GM6768@sar0.p1otr.com> <20150929155144.1e5513e7@limelight.wooz.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7354 [Barry Warsaw, 2015-09-29] > On Sep 29, 2015, at 09:46 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >(and remember to remove DPMT from debian/control if it's not in SVN ;P) > > Given that the final git migration is imminent (really! otherwise I'm going to > scream ;), can we not force people to go through this churn right now? but it's OK to force others to search for repo location, used workflow, tool, naming convention, etc? > Yes, let's discourage any new packages from manually migrating or starting out > in git just until flag day. But I'm not sure it's worth removing DPMT on > existing repos just to add it back, hopefully RSN. we agreed to something - 1 package per person, just for tests, with reports sent to this mailing list. Can you point me to a single report? Can you point me to a single person who converted only one package? Are you sure everyone uses the same workflow? I don't like it, I don't like it at all and that's why I complain and that's why I don't sponsor such packages. -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645