Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Scott Kitterman Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:30:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 29 12:28:33 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1443529696; bh=0Hy1MV6mkak8MIeLo7kJxDypv06ub8qPIG70EoypDDY=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From; b=IGIVQN4nXV5n9v4/THyP0udeuxi8zBAQIZQI+lQL0UvjwGWe6u3drRqLvwnZxfvVz JjyOyIGAGILp4B6TqxigRt9lwIOjKbL3CMxaeS2gjH+oXJjKGoZPuiGKXXAv8/Nd63 JzgAVrTRxBIneIJtOJ3pG+OdY7fFFNdUybX7gIeY= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12648 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/60F94837-A7AE-4578-81F8-39BEE375115F@kitterman.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 23 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:28:09 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <60F94837-A7AE-4578-81F8-39BEE375115F@kitterman.com> X-Original-References: <20150929115535.GA2584@sh73.dev.logilab.fr> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7337 On September 29, 2015 7:55:36 AM EDT, Julien Cristau wrote: >On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:26:44 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been >ignored >> >> >http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html#maintainership >> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin >> >> either policy changes or this has to stop at some point. >> >OTOH, this is experimental. It's not like this upload has any effect >on >anyone except to let Thomas work on packages that depend on it. Are >there any specific changes you object to, and that can't be easily >reverted before an upload to unstable? It's also not much effort to do a bit of coordination with the team. The technical impact of this kind of antisocial behavior is, IMO, secondary. Scott K