Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8076
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: conflicting packages python-pysocks and python-socksipy |
| Date | Fri, 08 Jan 2016 08:00:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOzbI-2Yr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qNiPF-7CQ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNo8G-2FT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jan 8 06:55:04 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debian@kitterman.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1452236087; bh=8SVTq6SZc3R/4dIbkvB1hplM6B+C27cDolrFNE/whX8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bl0F/r9o1lhgDR2zUtIQkHTAK4WhwuI/FY3KQsWF3y7Te4M9Kn00s4sS1ASN7MTGN YGwHputyTg8mMZK3BbUAjkEwlWX9bNKr64ehBLPOAcr9N/TT6G6RsdZIOIQVHWIRgm ECNA2BWAD6fKmm5/+7w7PJmrM9Boz6hv8ZXbhc94= |
| User-Agent | KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-71-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13394 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/10603532.JUDNOpNJrD@kitterma-e6430 |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 50 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 08 Jan 2016 01:54:48 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <10603532.JUDNOpNJrD@kitterma-e6430> |
| X-Original-References | <20160104191822.GA9605@fama> <65CB1FE6-6D8D-4626-BC33-0A6065703F98@kitterman.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8076 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Monday, January 04, 2016 07:58:26 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On January 4, 2016 2:18:22 PM EST, "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >TLDR: Both are the same, providing the "socks" module. We should > >remove one of them. Maybe renaming the other to python-socks. > > > >Longer story: Recently, I upgraded the outdated python-socksipy > >package. This involved following a new upstream. Later I was > >informed, that the new upstream was already packaged under the > >name python-pysocks. > > > >Questions: > > - shall we remove one of the package? > > > > (proposal: yes) > > Yes. Please file the RM bug. This is done (#810306). > > - which of the two packages should be removed from Debian? > > > > (proposal: remove pysocks, just because socksipy is older) > > Reasonable. Also both maintained by DPMT, so we can just pick. > > > - shall the other package provide dummy transitional packages? > > > > (proposal: yes) > > Actually, based on Python Policy both have wrong binary names. The binaries > should be python/python3-socks since they provide the socks module. No > need to rename the source. I think transitional packages are only needed > if there are rdepends that need updating and the can't be done now. > > - shall we rename the binary package to python-socks? > > > > (proposal: yes) > > Definitely. See above. So the above changes have been completed. I noticed that several packages had Recommends/Depends on one of the old package names, so I filed bugs. Bug#810309: torchat Bug#810308: python-sleekxmpp Bug#810307: offlineimap Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
conflicting packages python-pysocks and python-socksipy "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-01-04 20:20 +0100
Re: conflicting packages python-pysocks and python-socksipy Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-05 02:00 +0100
Re: conflicting packages python-pysocks and python-socksipy Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-01-08 08:00 +0100
Re: conflicting packages python-pysocks and python-socksipy "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-01-09 17:30 +0100
csiph-web