Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: "Diego M. Rodriguez" Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Enabling Python bindings for jellyfish Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 31 19:25:19 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.549 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, STATIC_RIMA_TDE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.75 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=B/rxNHQ9XaTBshzfbXKEDFEuGzyTB0fZivfO0+o+ZfY=; b=pzMlkTxb5ktNgOc4cVnfvO/RqWNL+VxNAPUoNlmMngvGb2Gwiy7Juspm5y5q32jnhT wylMWOzHq7Pu9EaJhGUKI0paHcuKjAFfIerSMWTmxSDp3lOAEwcOzuEq4ZYSmmWXhpA7 dBAr2WqYLeyhFOKuuK81/HCMH+9TMM1qLdpbqiNIyiMo08aNwZ/Gcwsvwo2UcqvVJR1a zkOY6zb/2QWNBjKXMsYvNznqfKBsanp6V4dnj4GNZzvqHlJpSOg2A87LuziYUfUzr6nV NzW0AwqgaQ5dHcrxDmXgwyUU45BOPRnJO4AiatNthl+eO7oSMergg+xjWWH/WnQrWViQ aeVg== X-Received: by 10.194.206.41 with SMTP id ll9mr86391997wjc.10.1451589905349; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:25:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13355 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151231192500.GA23521@ometeotl.lan Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 48 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:25:00 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20151231192500.GA23521@ometeotl.lan> X-Original-References: <20151228233014.GE2138@an3as.eu> <20151231173243.GA11155@ometeotl.lan> <4150651.QxNUcAh4pU@kitterma-e6430> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8037 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > That bit of policy doesn't officially kick in yet since these aren't both= in the=20 > archive yet. The policy is about consensus finding and not winning and l= osing. =20 > That's why I recommended discussing with the upstreams (and hopefully get= ting=20 > them in direct communication). Thanks for the pointer to the relevant Debian Policy chapter, Scott. My previous message was indeed intented to hopefully serve as a common ground towards reaching a consensus and as an aid when taking the discussion upstr= eam, rather than force or impose a decision - my apologies if it came too strong! --=20 Diego M. Rodriguez 36B3 42A9 9F2F 2CFB F79B FF9B B6C4 B901 06BC E232 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWhYEKAAoJELbEuQEGvOIy950P/37BQMHPwrZwkkwTquqcxsTd rCmJKApOmae4YrYW2fixUkaw3cEVmfcRWI1EvNHVKmgLPIvQre4Ohn0jROrg3ab6 bgVMzo42mCznag1iZD2Eh15GXDLTMqQKWzmS3V58xHASDVWHpVgBEqrcTdnXWaIb CHV49pNJTyM7/KKbW1TUjLDptFMylElIZe9i+4SWzf0sK/gRGksWuzksOURAZRAB RYccZ27zhV8hbu1r5+EhKsWUttNwh3anxPWK4kDPnVQ9JHrzLSUfFb/Y1VCxiZcj VWWrEi7UC3d418ZMUweensbjsWSDxegeUVblcKO1hIqW9UsERCzH9C8zs9tDqkVn oa/rOMB4cErxX6twBlfWJ15FZPMfOnBKGnEUuR59o/ghf18qBpFzcbRKWWAZai4d LGulZX1z4kFIr/azLu/kSYQxeRPBMFSDCz+BpyCjWvetggfuFwQ7ENNMHMLLS7dk VSRIk/JStyNRxjcQF+dE/gDtTpvrW1j0ShsM9xC0zJyxc0Ghn8bT7Slzd8tPgcut NI7jwajyA+HmFCs/DofwQq02+B6PeS1tgl8j1UbHs8C/MlyQYFgiuo3xAfYM0FD5 hWeMbK/Dl+ZlrcnVKHvnJgIM2/NXwhnX1DsSNCDWWZFAHJ9Ph+g1KPuHlop9Ew0r konf+9dgNYdRFS/Ltm9V =ts9Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--