Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Afif Elghraoui Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python,linux.debian.bugs.dist Subject: Multiarch-renamed python extensions not found during autopkgtest testing Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Dec 9 07:27:24 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.52 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 X-Originating-IP: 99.120.145.254 X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13277 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5667D77B.8050503@ghraoui.name Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 25 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Med Project List , 798066@bugs.debian.org X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:25:47 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <5667D77B.8050503@ghraoui.name> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7961 linux.debian.bugs.dist:699660 Hi, debian-python, For Debian Med's python packages that have compiled extensions, I noticed that test suites run via autopkgtest fail because the package cannot find those extensions, as they've been renamed with the multiarch triplet. It seems to only be a problem with autopkgtest because I have in one case manually installed such a package and successfully ran its test suite. I therefore reported #798066 [1] against autopkgtest, but quite some time has elapsed since then and I'd like to get this resolved. Does anyone know why this might be the case? Autopkgtest for these packages is currently not very helpful because there are many spurious failures due to this issue. There are more details in my original bug report [1]. Many thanks and regards Afif 1. http://bugs.debian.org/798066 -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name