Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7241
| Path | csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Packaging Bokeh |
| Date | Sat, 05 Sep 2015 08:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5fst-172-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Sep 5 06:44:27 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <diane@ghic.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, CAPINIT=0.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -6.1 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 1895 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 06:44:14 UTC |
| User-Agent | KMail/4.14.2 (Linux/4.1.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/12548 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2046623.4LEmuCvnNS@myrada |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 33 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 04 Sep 2015 22:44:23 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <2046623.4LEmuCvnNS@myrada> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7241 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi, I've made some limited progress trying to package Bokeh (BSD-3-Clause) upstream: http://bokeh.pydata.org/en/latest/ my packaging: https://github.com/detrout/python-bokeh I managed to get the version 0.9.1 from pypi installable. (Though since it was my own experiments I didn't remove the jquery / bootstrap libraries.) The most proper packaging would require grunt to be able to rebuild bokeh.js. I was wondering if releasing the pypi version would be good enough. (The package does at least contain a non-minimized version of bokeh.js) (And it looks like someone may have signed up to try and deal with the ITP for bokeh #756017) I recently tried to update to bokeh 0.9.3 and their unit tests flushed out a few more dependencies. I just packaged abstract_rendering (BSD-3-Clause) upstream: https://github.com/ContinuumIO/abstract_rendering/ my packaging: https://github.com/detrout/python-abstract-rendering Bokeh's unit tests also appear to depend on blaze, and that looks like that has several missing dependencies. Currently I built the packaging following the debian-qt team's common standards (source-less), Thought It looks like the python-modules team is just about to transition to git-dpm. Should I go ahead and submit abstract_rendering? Should I work on getting blaze submitted? Diane
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Packaging Bokeh Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2015-09-05 08:50 +0200
Re: Packaging Bokeh "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2015-09-05 10:00 +0200
Re: Packaging Bokeh Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2015-09-05 18:50 +0200
Re: Packaging Bokeh Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2015-09-06 06:50 +0200
csiph-web