Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7217

Re: Removing some python3-* packages

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Removing some python3-* packages
Date	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 04:00:02 +0200
Message-ID	<q1bGO-zW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pHSOm-6Yq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pJ7V0-4B5-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKhfB-7po-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZeIO-39Y-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <q17Wy-3Ef-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <q186e-46x-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q18zg-4Eq-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <q18IV-4PH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q19lE-5Oe-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q19vj-5Zj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q19F0-6aJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 25 01:51:44 2015
Old-Return-Path	<robertc@robertcollins.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.72 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	DYN_NJABL=ERR(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=ERR(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .robertcollins. - helo: .mail-oi0-f54.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eJ0Ice1+Pkiym4K1E4H1wBX4M0QG1c+wo1HjEQz5lGU=; b=FfwNV7yj8/e0XBwJIrvWODsoyrxsXJD0kZyjitGpzUbX4//CWkrcTFV85f8YnJ33Yv vrlB09J6TG/6Lu/kKdC824a9LV7K50Kyx9xGXuA0XGjF4K8z/EzIGwuGRZWnHJD5aBGQ Ktk0/L3TiSQ8kQqKY4Rg8OlntO/Y9qNLflSEBPRLWFHXB48jTyLSI01OwG+nyg3g2nZB Hhi1+KcUXzIHA3E0TCZKIiyviCcMqivrwFo4S8cia4+ztADKUlIxFJEBWLfUT+HZfY+k KwnPqatsRZMA8tOVI/+CwPc77FU0/vYTo/xdl19c0SZT6rscoDeunATn8gu49nawa3ZL l2bw==
X-Gm-Message-State	ALoCoQmEtTv3upPL6baoEi92mMtQrGu4ub6o1Qqc7z2l20OEN1NpLhaUi5XIOees4fwYTUDb5Wp2
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.202.105.133 with SMTP id e127mr23480484oic.60.1440467465482; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP	[122.57.103.106]
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/12524
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAJ3HoZ2W1Mak5pkHv+Y5D0Pm56OY_84Nrkpb-RWqieWMQ8bhHA@mail.gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	25
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:51:05 +1200
X-Original-Message-ID	<CAJ3HoZ2W1Mak5pkHv+Y5D0Pm56OY_84Nrkpb-RWqieWMQ8bhHA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<20150702155530.4e93b05d@limelight.wooz.org> <25C573EC-8BD4-4BB6-84EE-344C65343061@kitterman.com> <CAJ3HoZ0a9rSSAc-zv+7qhP+0n-wMGQ=hRM__TOGTuEsOpUKhuQ@mail.gmail.com> <55D4B1BF.30505@debian.org> <20150824175757.236d2f23@anarchist.wooz.org> <CAJ3HoZ1KOVnsj-nHKi4bCxpis-PuMvrwYGpp+2-giUu=q=4ruQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150824183701.37eb1b89@anarchist.wooz.org> <CAJ3HoZ23K5z=CM9Xjc26qX9so7w9bzimctij_QKZi6JB+mzF_A@mail.gmail.com> <20150824192357.4b1ff913@limelight.wooz.org> <CAJ3HoZ0MejDzhoaUe4wL5hVxviGP=R_Y8XazyLuC3KcH_MT-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <1440460162.2531806.364988089.19218732@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7217

Show key headers only | View raw

On 25 August 2015 at 11:49, Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, at 04:30 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> c) write convoluted tricky code to workaround the bugs and differing
>> behaviour on 3.4 vs 3.5.
>
> I use unittest.mock from Python 3.4 on several packages, and it has not
> required convoluted code. I would be very surprised if that code breaks
> when run under Python 3.5.

If it works with mock 1.3 (in stretch) and with unittest.mock from
3.4, then you're fine. Very much depends on the size and variety of
your codebase, whether you will have an issue or not.

But it doesn't take 'works for me' to invalidate the point: it
requires 'works for *everyone*' - and while you haven't experienced
the faults yourself that in no way invalidates the experience of folk
that have experienced it.

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Removing some python3-* packages Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-08-19 18:50 +0200
  Re: Removing some python3-* packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-25 00:00 +0200
    Re: Removing some python3-* packages Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> - 2015-08-25 00:10 +0200
      Re: Removing some python3-* packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-25 00:40 +0200
        Re: Removing some python3-* packages Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> - 2015-08-25 00:50 +0200
          Re: Removing some python3-* packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-25 01:30 +0200
            Re: Removing some python3-* packages Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> - 2015-08-25 01:40 +0200
              Re: Removing some python3-* packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-25 01:50 +0200
              Re: Removing some python3-* packages Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk> - 2015-08-25 01:50 +0200
                Re: Removing some python3-* packages Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> - 2015-08-25 04:00 +0200

csiph-web