Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Vincent Bernat Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Searching for sponsor and critique Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 15:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.187 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=ham X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=luffy.cx; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=postfix; bh=6uqhgVeOpIe/SuR8SLw4HHlDYu0=; b=Gi+ DganouWikB+vrsEpZZKA+rKRbL6XMEHUZbNlPrrSf2RLFblPWDyvv46DobBZkIZj btWYnCsuxq4jFHPV8wwwjXJfBFXXdXsY2pT5Kqjus39nbA8IFdo0pmK4pNXfWqha i5mgxqkmQtigV/H0M77x4Uv+mzMSoJBhS+b/LHds= Organization: Debian Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/12477 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 56 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 15:33:10 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <87y4hqoum9.fsf@zoro.exoscale.ch> <55C3C047.3080602@lennartweller.de> <55C73D90.50903@ring0.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7172 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E2=9D=A6 9 ao=C3=BBt 2015 13:46 +0200, Lennart Weller =C2= =A0: >> Everything looks good except the LICENSE.txt which is not here. It is in >> fact called LICENSE upstream and it should be added to the manifest to >> be present in the tarball. A note to upstream would be nice. Add a >> comment to debian/copyright pointing to the appropriate URL to find the >> license. As it is present in debian/copyright, you don't have to add a >> special patch or anything like that. > > What do you mean here? The LICENSE file is part of the git repo on > Github but not in the tarball on PyPI which is the base of the package. > Also the machine-readable copyright file basically includes the same > license and copyright notice as the LICENSE file from the git repo. Yes. I just said exactly that, didn't I? I also propose that you add a small comment in debian/copyright explaining that the license is not present in the tarball (which is a bug, upstream should add it to MANIFEST.in) but can be checked on GitHub. =2D-=20 Don't use conditional branches as a substitute for a logical expression. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVx1aWAAoJEJWkL+g1NSX5Q98P/2AsC8CPfqe0VgWPXtK63uN6 h/uLAVSg+Vw3/EGlS1d9GkRduZdM2wfEvrv40hnYLdEmOyAJxONW2fL+FfOKO4g/ ztbx63GHpOjhjDoPssc4WSXnQFglLq5A1MM+ptDd2HonX3pvwsPvq2z27Mlpuma0 fjR5Ip36ZCXMmKBgsZMxaWKJvHtX/GYl4rnQVkvDHD/vyWId626atd+YrNuHtlU+ EJnCCQdRVt2/Slirs3HsQpeLuuEkyEls/ZMVytVChMo9PLoNwkOqxf80CLBbVw0F S1aUvhMLEfCHyCSRnupTAPcD79+frpUzK56iPVLMnxbuedkVt4wiSVZL8jKUSQzy BwqDf4CNmg1MzAWrvEIXAM1fw4zm6eAYZqz5hURixCp1TOJIMEEzfNM9ELmamgRY ozgrk7J6GS7e1bs+bcU5vhEeljrP1XG6k0UkUjJnGJlyXZ6v1DcTMZ8Hp7K2sZ1z YRLZ1689P03Z2k0k1EmZh5SllBvbntXpNMhL2vRqUOvWJQnoptLkSAbPjz7L06QB qwjJVSkPUvh0aA8lsV6+F0gRHMX09m+w10EIg1X7ikGU0+MsXHSXtb2vtTO0dhd/ TfgGHyoCYRzFv5O+8DetHEoobsi2LnIj5NS+Ue8A3Dzr7WhGp8xJkVVV6rWP60oV i6hOGaVRqzbf+YXyuiaB =e10B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m3r3nch9ih.fsf@neo.luffy.cx