Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7141

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional?

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!news.glorb.com!diesel.cu.mi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@surgut.co.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional?
Date	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 23:40:02 +0200
Message-ID	<pQYhQ-5P2-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pOLf5-yk-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOMb9-1TR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pON7c-3eW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOXge-10m-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pP2zg-8rx-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pQXlM-4tq-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
Old-Return-Path	<dimitri.ledkov@surgut.co.uk>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-1.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .surgut. - helo: .mail-lb0-x235.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=surgut.co.uk; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/UGewJ5Mol6wjbwXNNx/7c8Gmp+Z+fjSieq8aFkuhls=; b=MlLkZqj1t7nUZJRXeIHXkEeMgnvbMAhYRndJ+qUj7TNMUXJmoTBuenWORkl6wzBHsP Bl0kStDArAmBn4dIacb1suvO9avpaQS/WdkHiPDa1IYWUeEBHnVgKGD5j6QRejpU3rq5 gmEtr4Jbn+0dlT7mJ4V1TpSUGud86sISGEE/I=
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/UGewJ5Mol6wjbwXNNx/7c8Gmp+Z+fjSieq8aFkuhls=; b=UrtKkTzNdE4bkz15M7RoqSQPv8qU59O7p3bc13yngL7iGFOhWKNSgAxNFQPGvxyCu3 VtC0GzEH21FY6k/MJn+MS3Od9C+MWC+aWRNhXwz/tTDnn9H/pkzWbVsSCWe7c1EKmnkj j4vjo9grHUjP0gJihYKscuN5up+A6c3Woy2aM2sJwyUevUCozpgBW4fqjyVttVYSp90v IFIt52sVQ42Ckz9BfKEi4+0n72L5rSCMF/MnVcZcw42Bqw0dyGISnZqGTqj/jFNCqTZH kwSSf3LiN6tgsmlbRQVAbItlONmYSHVASLOH7deImq63zRZmtYPriljD0S7Q3/PG7VUb hk7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State	ALoCoQnVQXJZtnU6j5JBAP2nbb2olYNQ/2gVHLFhg1RfvJFr2ghX7/hfqHrrCqpJvXaQ8C/Q0GwH
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.112.155.164 with SMTP id vx4mr28905079lbb.38.1438031624933; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP	[86.14.120.99]
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/12442
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	25
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:13:44 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<CANBHLUhTu7ciizgAhTYom1T_YFCA_H6fpk6LEadSWSGyz7zGYA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<20150721191750.GA24996@onerussian.com> <20150721201611.GA21591@p1otr.com> <cd17ec35-2c16-4753-8f43-fa0369eefdb9@email.android.com> <20150722080202.GP18403@sar0.p1otr.com> <20150722134501.GQ28964@onerussian.com> <20150727203114.GC21591@p1otr.com>
Xref	aioe.org linux.debian.maint.python:7141

Show key headers only | View raw

On 27 July 2015 at 21:31, Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> wrote:
>> > I already followed Dimitri's suggestion to add no_proxy=localhost and
>> > will add your PYBUILD_FAKE_PROXY later today
>>
>> awesome!  feel free to tune the name to whatever you feel more appropriate.
>
> I simply do not forward empty http{,s}_proxy, is that good enough?
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dh-python/dh-python.git/commit/?id=052138369f866d5c09b44433f0023950dae28a74

way too pythonic, proceed to go, collect 200.

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUhTu7ciizgAhTYom1T_YFCA_H6fpk6LEadSWSGyz7zGYA@mail.gmail.com

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-07-22 10:10 +0200
  Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2015-07-22 15:50 +0200
    Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Daniel Stender <debian@danielstender.com> - 2015-07-22 16:10 +0200
    Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@surgut.co.uk> - 2015-07-27 23:40 +0200

csiph-web