Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Jeroen Ploemen Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: review for audio-visualizer-python/2.2.4-1 Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 09:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: "Aeliton G. Silva" X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Mar 7 08:12:00 2026 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/KNqB+orsAQenl0WDLh1xoF4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Debian-User: jcfp X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23687 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20260307081139.508bc96b@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 47 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 08:11:39 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20260307081139.508bc96b@debian.org> X-Original-References: <20260306121025.32bd5e0f@debian.org> <8677247959cf85ba3b188a78f9e2eb5850d08e11.camel@aeliton.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17425 --Sig_/KNqB+orsAQenl0WDLh1xoF4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 06 Mar 2026 13:52:05 -0300 "Aeliton G. Silva" wrote: > I have reverted the change that introduced the patch you have > mentioned and introduced another patch that sets 'license-files' in > pyproject.toml, which makes the lint errors go away. The patch has > been upstreamed (review pending). Now that's a nice and clean solution. =20 > I have reported this to the upstream and we will investigate this > there with them. >=20 > For the moment, I've marked the test to be skipped on i{3,6}86, as > it passes on other platforms. Great, let's see what upstream makes of it. Uploaded without further changes! --Sig_/KNqB+orsAQenl0WDLh1xoF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEd8lhnEnWos3N8v+qQoMEoXSNzHoFAmmr3bwACgkQQoMEoXSN zHqkJxAA2jlqSqh3xvWTXEhki+KYrEoH2DRksHkmhZ25C196I4jhoXkgM7r35+hy UqZEvnBmTe6OiMtnc69JIV4txv4mdXfDR3vEkQepViR6DrpNgYuPPz7dnHg4SfTO qhPt+tAbHP+HLdaZZLxvAkCNIRUKm+H9UGr4PZShWhAPsgG3SsKeoWfIb0knjhQl bFgXNdkNMOn8NpGE5BsB7ZiXgPfe41Hh9pZ00womvFQd/GJl2f5i8GqeO0lvTCdB U1Wr77J3V+NDE1M65/XIpCjGzrmEbQOQjakYiZwoRF/BOjLn4D5AbgW67IKBPp+7 qFLX1BdjPBvgQMbqfPEwRh/+uOzwgFtCiTW0yyF81zJqvQ3U0u6sZmQneetQCjZu p4EWJFKMuyhM7eah3kgl1idwSBTKl3nuTGJ2iG+if+UR7wI9SVPXGsiU/YsZ/LvA HQ2jn3CgeSAPJUwyVEl8NnSXZAS5Imurp6KG8UWEUTO76ZM0rtDHgad2RgoM+Nzm BphcXp1q1CEHHf1WJDj6Kk8Qg9xWEeKqJVOguk8qsS8zhfFjEjkzTEHx8inARIxz xcBi3DpGxRyGcjbM9sExilT/QMOppzi2PMVNOj2JhgfLIiVRHf8c24+XN4Mv1ow0 2oJm4awP9GMwHrSk16QyvcTl6ZJQD60uBC/NAFklKH2Bn9PFJuo= =UFnK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/KNqB+orsAQenl0WDLh1xoF4--