Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17350

Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ?

Path	csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ?
Date	Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:30:01 +0100
Message-ID	<McyA9-a6gq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<McyA9-a6gq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MctK9-a337-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mcy78-a5Os-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <McygN-a68C-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jan 12 22:25:57 2026
Old-Return-Path	<soren@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Organization	Debian
Face	iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWIg4F7bGiws7ReTkyy kYoXFRrd6/4yMA0PAAACaklEQVQ4y22TwXabMBBFJaPuNZGSNZZp1uhM6BpkJeu4VFk3bsL/f0Lf CHC6qHyOgbl68zTDoIwaVfh3tUopTUGpbFToDiFnY9IY2oMAZYMiS4R9SfbSXepSS5EcFAa/muIU aRj8mkoUqrEraFzhYegBmqig0LyCIyM8DAwPlpBqmJVYaD2UeWZ3abVjsqKIojg+hY4omsyIcNSi qIBM6jJWOveS6kvBeVvHJ+VYzJUW88RmA12UiBx3HEcUMRuzIZI6tBQovTrPclNB3AuUXoXvs0XY C3B2baJpW4Dn2ZpVMInCirkxoyhM1qpK5nFrO65QvCrCqql2DyPgvm94iMQz5/PmISuEotxQGMD5 M5G1N9CjXJ5HQH96BZG2xx6AzejYZccxT4Re3Zr4bPKkCcGcz5Or3dVEABkAUY/znnVcQVVkrXVU vomoEJFe7x4nQuaZmZELL6qnXZGIB5YV/Q2IogtSmyNybEcBX2+QCLOAQYm+gmoORUrYzV7dc6R2 T1WPm45oVEQqsjtoIovHyTmcyxMhVVxTqapomZyLlAmTKC9AmjgamXXGZo+epNrXO3wGGiPRHbKL FnMy2RRgRb1gzFXXGjhICp8wqaTtdtyQH6nWTfkatJvJJoUCbOjSC7wR9/naEVognxrOFdLh7Ugx QpA/0QT4pRV0+u2dqsXD5y9EBDjVAJS3ZZLxmZblgmsU8x7mBeCKg48Py7WU2IiH1epbEbC8K9Ms y0cpcySVUcdQVrBY+rEsv+XpYgFKXT8B3v2yATxv8fKK2EfC358tsIMLYqfD401xA0j1EY4P/wWf IbhlOWyBv4OQsywBM8MAAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3602743.taCxCBeP46"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Debian-User	soren
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23601
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5474525.MHq7AAxBmi@soren-desktop
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	52
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:25:33 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID	<5474525.MHq7AAxBmi@soren-desktop>
X-Original-References	<a802c5c8-57ce-43a1-ba71-251ae96f0409@debian.org> <90841425-6388-4EC9-A3D4-1B36E7E2CCFC@debian.org> <402fc7e8-99bd-4896-9780-8ee8b40008a7@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17350

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Monday, January 12, 2026 3:09:17 PM Mountain Standard Time Louis-Philippe 
Véronneau wrote:
> On 2026-01-12 16:55, Dominik George wrote:
> Honestly, if we're only using the global Salsa activity (instead of the
> currently non-existing Debian Python Team activity), I think it's safe
> to kick everyone from the team who hasn't been active in 3 years.

I would agree with that.  I think we just send an email to the list with the 
names and remove them if there is no response.  The example response we did 
receive would be sufficient in my mind to not remove a person for an 
additional year.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

csiph-web