Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17345
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? |
| Date | Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:40:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <McxNL-a5G7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MctK9-a337-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MctTP-a37f-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mcx1n-a57C-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <McxkK-a5vS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <McxkK-a5vS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jan 12 21:36:48 2026 |
| Old-Return-Path | <csmall@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-105.209 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 600 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 21:36:33 UTC |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOJu0Yy43idX/KxrilGfcGT17fQkbZQjfpjyt8bzzfXmbPWWjNrQjEjm SaGZbhjMb3zwB4PIJbz3dQR9rwLipdBNGgaME4+FZJAUqnimRtDZg262SYelVl1RwS7r+K8pQXS vpt7deagvShdRMicGrxMLSlrbr01EdMyyRZlxgv0U6g== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | AGHT+IG1enZV0k8UOC9lGv3t5cnXFsyrln5So7kaa47pij9H3+5bt7zqi4z2zPF1bh4duGhYCvOclXQrPMtOd563GG8= |
| X-Received | by 2002:a05:6102:3ecd:b0:5e5:6360:1f60 with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-5ecbb1423bfmr8296112137.41.1768253161312; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:26:01 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID | <CALy8Cw7xAPxiTAHyxHhqB64ZkhxAKBAr1btzK+n6=09q8CmfzA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Gm-Features | AZwV_Qh8vcNGHB-sr-_Po_lveDdSjlK50CGVgtCM3ek7BqnkNDm1xcWB-YPHt2g |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008dad69064837857c" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23595 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALy8Cw7xAPxiTAHyxHhqB64ZkhxAKBAr1btzK+n6=09q8CmfzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 76 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:25:50 +1100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CALy8Cw7xAPxiTAHyxHhqB64ZkhxAKBAr1btzK+n6=09q8CmfzA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <a802c5c8-57ce-43a1-ba71-251ae96f0409@debian.org> <4370652.mvXUDI8C0e@soren-desktop> <87344ay385.fsf@fama.lan> <CALF6qJk1-Du2PQHR21PPB_ow9KuWiy0BsyL82L-Z9kRyAV1U8g@mail.gmail.com> <209455ba-a05e-40b6-90af-bf939f741724@debian.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17345 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, I think this idea is good security hygiene. A 3+ years list would help in a way because it can bring up corner cases or problems wirh the filtering method, such as: On Tue, 13 Jan 2026, 8:06 am Louis-Philippe Véronneau, <pollo@debian.org> wrote: > > 1. It's inactivity _in the Debian Python team_ only. That doesn't mean > these people aren't active members of the Debian community :) > > 2. That info is already public: > > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/python-team/packages/-/group_members?sort=oldest_last_activity The first item doesn't match the second there. If the intent is to remove people from the Python team due to not doing anything with the Python team for (say) 3 years you'll need to look for that info elsewhere. That list is sorted by any salsa activity. For example it says my last activity was 6 Jan 2026, which it was for the Debian project. My last Python activity was February 2025. Now on that list for 3+ years means they've done nothing on Salsa anywhere so definitely they've not done anything in the Python project, so its a good start but won't meet the full goal. - Craig
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 18:20 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 18:30 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 21:50 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 22:10 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 22:10 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 22:40 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 22:50 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 23:00 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 23:10 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 23:30 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2026-01-14 01:30 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2026-01-12 22:30 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Arian Ott <arian.ott@ieee.org> - 2026-01-12 22:50 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2026-01-17 23:50 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2026-01-20 05:10 +0100
Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2026-01-20 20:00 +0100
csiph-web