Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17314
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: RFC: Packaging pyartnet - Patch build system from uv to setuptools? |
| Date | 2026-01-01 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <M8uEN-7jwm-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <M8uv8-7jsK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Jan 01, 2026 at 06:17:04PM +0100, Arian Ott wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I am currently packaging pyartnet for Debian (Bug: 1124471). The upstream >project uses uv as build backend. When building the package, gbp fails >since uv_build is unavailable and can't be imported. > >Pyartnet requires no significant external libraries. >Can I switch the build backend to setuptools using a patch or is this >considered bad practice? > >https://salsa.debian.org/Arian-Ott/pyartnet/-/blob/debian/latest/pyproject.toml?ref_type=heads#L62-64 I would do that (and did for python-cryptography-vectors, though that package is trivial and doesn't contain Python code, and I was just reverting an upstream change, not even writing my own patch). -- WBR, wRAR
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
RFC: Packaging pyartnet - Patch build system from uv to setuptools? Arian Ott <arian.ott@ieee.org> - 2026-01-01 18:20 +0100
Re: RFC: Packaging pyartnet - Patch build system from uv to setuptools? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-01-01 18:30 +0100
Re: RFC: Packaging pyartnet - Patch build system from uv to setuptools? Arian Ott <arian.ott@ieee.org> - 2026-01-01 18:40 +0100
csiph-web