Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!srl.newsdeef.eu!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Soren Stoutner Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 9 17:13:11 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Organization: Debian Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWIg4F7bGiws7ReTkyy kYoXFRrd6/4yMA0PAAACaklEQVQ4y22TwXabMBBFJaPuNZGSNZZp1uhM6BpkJeu4VFk3bsL/f0Lf CHC6qHyOgbl68zTDoIwaVfh3tUopTUGpbFToDiFnY9IY2oMAZYMiS4R9SfbSXepSS5EcFAa/muIU aRj8mkoUqrEraFzhYegBmqig0LyCIyM8DAwPlpBqmJVYaD2UeWZ3abVjsqKIojg+hY4omsyIcNSi qIBM6jJWOveS6kvBeVvHJ+VYzJUW88RmA12UiBx3HEcUMRuzIZI6tBQovTrPclNB3AuUXoXvs0XY C3B2baJpW4Dn2ZpVMInCirkxoyhM1qpK5nFrO65QvCrCqql2DyPgvm94iMQz5/PmISuEotxQGMD5 M5G1N9CjXJ5HQH96BZG2xx6AzejYZccxT4Re3Zr4bPKkCcGcz5Or3dVEABkAUY/znnVcQVVkrXVU vomoEJFe7x4nQuaZmZELL6qnXZGIB5YV/Q2IogtSmyNybEcBX2+QCLOAQYm+gmoORUrYzV7dc6R2 T1WPm45oVEQqsjtoIovHyTmcyxMhVVxTqapomZyLlAmTKC9AmjgamXXGZo+epNrXO3wGGiPRHbKL FnMy2RRgRb1gzFXXGjhICp8wqaTtdtyQH6nWTfkatJvJJoUCbOjSC7wR9/naEVognxrOFdLh7Ugx QpA/0QT4pRV0+u2dqsXD5y9EBDjVAJS3ZZLxmZblgmsU8x7mBeCKg48Py7WU2IiH1epbEbC8K9Ms y0cpcySVUcdQVrBY+rEsv+XpYgFKXT8B3v2yATxv8fKK2EfC358tsIMLYqfD401xA0j1EY4P/wWf IbhlOWyBv4OQsywBM8MAAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2267157.NgBsaNRSFp"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Debian-User: soren X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23236 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2199215.OBFZWjSADL@soren-desktop Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 89 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 10:12:46 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <2199215.OBFZWjSADL@soren-desktop> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17056 --nextPart2267157.NgBsaNRSFp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Soren Stoutner To: debian-python@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 10:12:46 -0700 Message-ID: <2199215.OBFZWjSADL@soren-desktop> Organization: Debian In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tuesday, September 9, 2025 6:02:14=E2=80=AFAM Mountain Standard Time San= tiago Vila=20 wrote: > Hello Otto. >=20 > I've finally disabled the pipelines, not exactly in the same way you > proposed in the MR, but in another way which I believe preserves the > spirit. >=20 > I still would like to know how much memory can we expect from Salsa CI > runners, and how likely or unlikely it is that we will be able to > enable Salsa CI for graph-tool some day. In case it is helpful to others, I have setup a small number of custom runn= ers=20 for packages I maintain where the standard CI runners are not sufficient. In my case, these are situations where the standard CI runners cannot finis= h=20 at least one of the stages within 3 hours. Using a custom runner allows me= to=20 set any timeout I prefer. In some cases, because the hardware on my custom= =20 runner is more powerful than the standard CI runners, I no longer need to=20 adjust the timeout, but in other cases an adjustment is still needed. For= =20 example: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pyinstaller/-/blob/debian/ master/debian/salsa-ci.yml?ref_type=3Dheads =46or anyone wanting to setup a custom runner, I have updated the wiki with= the=20 instructions that worked for me: https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc/CustomRunners To round out this conversation, I am currently in the process of developing= a=20 custom salsa-ci.yml for qt6-webengine. The unique problem with that packag= e=20 is that it produces over 4.5 GB of artifacts, which exceeds the maximum=20 allowed by Salsa (in addition to needing to run for longer and needing more= =20 system resources than the standard runners). I have not finished, but=20 currently I have a modified salsa-ci.yml that performs some of the tests I = am=20 interested in tracking: https://salsa.debian.org/soren/qt6-webengine/-/blob/salsa-ci/debian/salsa-c= i.yml?ref_type=3Dheads =2D-=20 Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org --nextPart2267157.NgBsaNRSFp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmjAYA4ACgkQwufLJ66w tgMpQxAAm7L6dS+TTsQVRyk/9Ukw7mivZFBl0OmOIKPfbYL9qC4wTjOUOR006gZB lm8cAvV/pAwlh4Jrq1WJuvgLBOF6MHkiBChH4kELjt5cL5hvH1mWiGPoNN8TNpzk cUE0xsIqlgxf6lhUzMhShAA2YVinbbm7oozDunZYm7DKIR4NS0cJ9bT20E8HlnAz 9bxpdL4APk05jFHhzp7y+f8hawH3R/rYnA5+L/Za8iqTAFrsKlEmhaQC/3cIY1wv pWU3yfXlazk9E63G1eP067aUc3QZ1C5A79Raa06qmaDSy18gG+KJecWww6W6Ozjy doDxIgbOb6GRDPstTpgTTHA39RiCl0txUb/3JlxcawH103Xe1nIN+QT+7KZMrlt3 rvfXeHaJdh3+EGMTi1ft8Hx4Zc8HXaWyMe2aRfLApyw45kWEe9vSRP1vhlAYrz55 jUZ9IJfHBgbMARpjrMJVtaJU4YDvXc22rVykj3ikfOU8Wj4mDJZ/iu/WsPMmNNPO NErRaSwpt0sNbtZZkN2RMm84KrXUwL5cRtsHkZGqGvYZLrnxsEL7tZkZGOu6ZJIM STUmysgVhzIyXYsEUb7VAaXqKHeXgzlxe4rhSMXS5WSSabqlSM3zddMH9XsJG1Iw a9euHgeKdSo7FeCFgBBw7qdOmNSpqbaZ3ZwGrhsRXY95fheh/8E= =LfY2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2267157.NgBsaNRSFp--