Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Santiago Vila Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 03:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Otto =?utf-8?B?S2Vrw6Rsw6RpbmVu?= X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 9 01:36:31 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: sanvila X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23233 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aL-EjEwGXjgWEIJ4@nuc Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 21 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Aayush Raj , Jerome Benoit X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 03:36:12 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17053 Ok, I've taken a look at the build log. A while ago I inserted a "spy" line in debian/rules so that we could see this in the build log: =========================== MemAvailable: 7472456 kB SwapFree: 0 kB nproc: 2 =========================== So, yes, this will not work in Salsa CI, unless there is a lot of swap. Simple questions: Do all Salsa CI runners have the same amount of RAM? Do all Salsa CI runners have zero amount of swap? (Why?) (While we are at it: What should people do when a package needs more than 8 GB of RAM to build? I could provide a list of such packages, as I collect statistics during my archive rebuilds). Thanks.