Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17225

Re: Weird status of pdm

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Weird status of pdm
Date	Thu, 04 Dec 2025 18:00:01 +0100
Message-ID	<LYkQp-lRT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<LYeL0-hQ5-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 4 16:59:53 2025
Old-Return-Path	<soren@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Organization	Debian
Face	iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWIg4F7bGiws7ReTkyy kYoXFRrd6/4yMA0PAAACaklEQVQ4y22TwXabMBBFJaPuNZGSNZZp1uhM6BpkJeu4VFk3bsL/f0Lf CHC6qHyOgbl68zTDoIwaVfh3tUopTUGpbFToDiFnY9IY2oMAZYMiS4R9SfbSXepSS5EcFAa/muIU aRj8mkoUqrEraFzhYegBmqig0LyCIyM8DAwPlpBqmJVYaD2UeWZ3abVjsqKIojg+hY4omsyIcNSi qIBM6jJWOveS6kvBeVvHJ+VYzJUW88RmA12UiBx3HEcUMRuzIZI6tBQovTrPclNB3AuUXoXvs0XY C3B2baJpW4Dn2ZpVMInCirkxoyhM1qpK5nFrO65QvCrCqql2DyPgvm94iMQz5/PmISuEotxQGMD5 M5G1N9CjXJ5HQH96BZG2xx6AzejYZccxT4Re3Zr4bPKkCcGcz5Or3dVEABkAUY/znnVcQVVkrXVU vomoEJFe7x4nQuaZmZELL6qnXZGIB5YV/Q2IogtSmyNybEcBX2+QCLOAQYm+gmoORUrYzV7dc6R2 T1WPm45oVEQqsjtoIovHyTmcyxMhVVxTqapomZyLlAmTKC9AmjgamXXGZo+epNrXO3wGGiPRHbKL FnMy2RRgRb1gzFXXGjhICp8wqaTtdtyQH6nWTfkatJvJJoUCbOjSC7wR9/naEVognxrOFdLh7Ugx QpA/0QT4pRV0+u2dqsXD5y9EBDjVAJS3ZZLxmZblgmsU8x7mBeCKg48Py7WU2IiH1epbEbC8K9Ms y0cpcySVUcdQVrBY+rEsv+XpYgFKXT8B3v2yATxv8fKK2EfC358tsIMLYqfD401xA0j1EY4P/wWf IbhlOWyBv4OQsywBM8MAAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11927184.zNSHVdQH6F"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Debian-User	soren
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23459
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/3422689.da0VxnkfJ1@soren-desktop
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	72
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>, Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Thu, 04 Dec 2025 09:59:28 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID	<3422689.da0VxnkfJ1@soren-desktop>
X-Original-References	<aTFh0WohCRHh-9Hd@nuc>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17225

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thursday, December 4, 2025 3:26:25 AM Mountain Standard Time Santiago Vila 
wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I would like to get some help with "pdm". The package builds fine in salsa 
ci:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm/-/pipelines
> 
> but it fails in the buildds:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pdm

You have a number of tests that are failing on the buildds.

One of the differences between the buildds and Salsa CI is that the buildds do 
not allow any internet access during build, whereas Salsa CI does not enforce 
that.  So, the first place I would recommend looking is to see if the tests 
that are failing require internet access.

If that is the case, you can disable just those tests during the build, while 
enabling them in autopkgtest (which does allow internet access).

If these tests do not require internet access, then you might dig deeper into 
the error message for each test to see why they are failing.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Weird status of pdm Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 11:30 +0100
  Re: Weird status of pdm Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 18:00 +0100
    Re: Weird status of pdm Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 23:50 +0100

csiph-web