Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andrey Rakhmatullin Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-lsp-server new upstream version Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Nov 22 15:35:26 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.998 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B/WE0b8xdC5EV5Ir" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23412 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aSHYLKumBhHtIa7z@belkar.wrar.name Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 74 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:35:08 +0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17190 --B/WE0b8xdC5EV5Ir Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 12:30:29PM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote: >> No, the upload to Debian archive is only done by your sponsor. >> >> > >> > Push your repo to salsa.debian.org: >> >> This is not about uploading to the archive. >> > >Thanks for the clarifications Andrey. > >About pushing it to salsa, can I do it or this should also be done by a >sponsor? You should push but not tag. >> > > Can you test if this is a test only dependency and can be >> > > annotated >> > > with ? >> > > >> > >> > Good shout, thanks. websockets are in the [project.optional- >> > dependencies] in the pyproject.toml of the upstream, so I assume it >> > should be annotated with . >> >> What matters is whether it's used for building or just for testing >> and >> whether the package builds fine with the nocheck build profile after >> your >> changes. You shouldn't just guess. > >If I remove either black or python3-websockets from debian/control, gbp >buildpackage will succeed creating python_lsp_server-1.13.2-py3-none- >any.whl, but the test session will fail when any of the packages is not >installed. > >The debian package builds normally after annotating both dependencies >with . Still, it's a bad idea to annotate deps with a build profile without=20 actually testing it. --=20 WBR, wRAR --B/WE0b8xdC5EV5Ir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmkh2CctFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh UW4P/3bEzCxdwO/2vq4DWmyECKHxyzSDY4gYVqeFdmkudts0Ln3OP9yfSBZOfTr1 Y51499acbnFH1eVsp5sLJt7SI2JzdLXdCotWWc89mOc8OrhILta/E6m/d6CSfT+z P5FPTlIckE/X/AiE/bFYLypYrddN3MAx9/B0aBKEYdTTSK1r0eIx7KY3iLsIwx76 H3sQ1gfg2zCZkb2RsIAIIKdOB/hV2/11y7AIavGwnHkFTuOi7gc30GTGwEJXcdzX MGFxJsyQ8HTg80sgfzMu9/Ag+NlvalxisI+o5b16h5m2L2t3Bi75nVN7Lop4Ksyw FaQzO6d7Y9ZgJvjDSkH319gQQROW2syQ4h/cxTH7db7WU9iQ+3npgAgVPfFmWQhp pEUvjC2ZAkGQWK+Bt8LIPFvARmHcPti8WV8XyRg0ludyfrB0wmXWcuH1SIoO095x bgFTRuE3cYZz6BsqNTENlBQSlhTVaK0Z7qnBRoU8CKd3yb83nbOu0j34GnfkBU8e jGHwZW2uPb0ZvTMXzkSSn9d5b42podVsGrE1Mzs8WG+Sh33GRHizZHrJDdVCI/xY GBnTb/KAr0ILnWJ/nidcb/UIeWNbMOG6kvRrHJ/kEPqq+IklUqblt5ivKENWm3Z0 ilxvpCZiGgP/t+q9LO2xkpMCQjnTtjQwqcKx6IN8NIFYoMND =7LOr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B/WE0b8xdC5EV5Ir--