Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17148

Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Date Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:20:01 +0100
Message-ID <LQIdb-cHg4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <LP2g2-bxi4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP2g2-bxi4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP2g2-bxi4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP489-byDc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP54d-bzfC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP7pn-bAOi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LQIdb-cHg4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 13 16:11:31 2025
Old-Return-Path <doko@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -2.7
Old-X-Envelope-From doko@debian.org
Old-X-Envelope-To <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23351
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ed4cc729-dd48-4234-a68a-ab2ccef82f52@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 33
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:11:10 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <ed4cc729-dd48-4234-a68a-ab2ccef82f52@debian.org>
X-Original-References <E1vHq2d-000qyx-0M@fasolo.debian.org> <8605652.T7Z3S40VBb@soren-laptop> <10370999.Qv0yOoSAZ5@soren-desktop> <871pm7j3ls.fsf@gmail.com> <E8BB2D46-0D16-45F6-BE05-07A16052CA11@stoutner.com> <7656f4eb-4dd5-4bdb-9bda-a2a055fedf3c@t-online.de> <d0f61f41-ce9e-4537-ae89-5ccba2034487@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17148

Show key headers only | View raw


On 11/9/25 13:37, Gregor Riepl wrote:
>> There are only a few packages that ship a binary only binary approach 
>> in the Python corner. And if so the ecosystem is more complex. That's 
>> not the case for keepkey.
> 
> This seems quite odd to me. If a Python module contains a corresponding 
> application that is frequently used directly, I would expect this to be 
> installed in its own package, named like the application, and not in a 
> pyhon3-modulename package.
> 
> If the corresponding module is rarely, if ever used, it's probably 
> better to not produce a python3-modulename package at all, and simply 
> put the module into /usr/share/modulename - this is described in the 
> packaging policy: [1]
> 
> In fact, I can't find any guidance on combined Python module+application 
> packages (except for the mentioned case of private modules) in the 
> Debian Python Policy. If there is any, I'd be very interested as well.
> 
> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ 
> #programs-shipping-private-modules

care to draft something for the Debian policy?

another reason for splitting even one binary is to have the python3-* 
package M-A: same or M-A: foreign.  This is usually required for 
extension modules very low in the dependency chain.  I didn't check if 
that's the case for this specific package.

Addressing these issues in the policy also should give ftp-masters some 
guidance.

Matthias

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 02:20 +0100
  Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 04:20 +0100
    Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2025-11-09 05:20 +0100
      Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2025-11-09 07:50 +0100
        Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 15:40 +0100
        Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2025-11-13 17:20 +0100
          Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-13 19:10 +0100
            Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-20 23:00 +0100
      Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 13:30 +0100

csiph-web