Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Lucas Nussbaum Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie? Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 10:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Mar 30 08:23:19 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.947 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.438, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, GMAIL=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Debian-User: lucas X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22949 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Z-j7SezDxx0yZRka@grub.nussbaum.fr Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 50 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Alexandre Detiste , James Addison , debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 10:05:29 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <84b7b620-6f18-4f54-a13d-bb38ae0ee839@fsfe.org> <73CF4D23-2E84-40DB-9EBE-D74E9585ED00@riseup.net> <6d4e26d0-5fbd-4893-9264-1fb255111404@riseup.net> <418B4F61-1ADC-49EE-9946-9D31623456CD@riseup.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16829 Hi, On 18/03/25 at 10:11 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 18 March 2025 5:43:41 am IST, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > >Le lun. 17 mars 2025 à 03:56, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > >> I will check the pseudo-excuses on britney in around week. Hopefully, this > >> upload should solve majority of issues. > > > >Only five autopkgtest failing and already two packages fixed ! > > > >Can we ask $someone to rebuild everything from unstable that > >depends on matplotlib against this new version ? > >(to see what fails) > > Since there is no as such ABI for this, which other modules use, so it won't be a transition per se as far as I understand. > > Otherwise it won't be possible to do right now since we are in toolchain freeze. > > But it does make sense to test the reverse build depends at least at the this (pre-release) stage, to avoid FTBFS bugs as much as possible. > > >I might remember there was a free-service instance available > >somewhere but wouldn't mind some hand-holding. > > I do not have such resources to do massive rebuilds like these. > > I am adding Lucas to the thread. Lucas, do you think you could help us here? Sorry for not replying earlier. I see that you uploaded matplotlib 3.10 to unstable in the meantime. I did a rebuild of unstable two days ago, and did not notice anything specific related to matplotlib. The build failures involving matplotlib are: graph-tool_2.91+ds-4_unstable.log healpy_1.18.0-1_unstable.log pandas_2.2.3+dfsg-8_unstable.log python-csb43_0.10.1+dfsg-1_unstable.log python-maggma_0.70.0-3_unstable.log python-mne_1.9.0-1_unstable.log pytroll-schedule_0.7.2-2_unstable.log sphinx-copybutton_0.5.2-2_unstable.log xarray-sentinel_0.9.5+ds-3_unstable.log (those are not necessarily caused by matplotlib changes) You can find the relevant logs at http://qa-logs.debian.net/2025/03/27/ Best, Lucas