Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.usenet.ovh!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pybuild autopkgtest Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Mar 14 14:42:10 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5 Dkim-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout05.partage.renater.fr 3F6A6A00F2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF136 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652) Thread-Topic: pybuild autopkgtest Thread-Index: QJCb+jI82hr6GLhKhCzyvE65sY/Vcg== X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate: clean X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore: -100 X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddufedutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecutffgpfetvffgtfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevkfgjfhfugggtgffothesthejtgdtiidtjeenucfhrhhomheprffkveevtecuhfhrvgguvghrihgtqdfgmhhmrghnuhgvlhcuoehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelfeekueejgfejieeggfffffdugeehfefgfeeftefhteektdeivdfhieejieefgfenucfkphepuddtrddvheegrddvgedtrddugeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddtrddvheegrddvgedtrddugeehpdhhvghlohepiihsthhorhgvqdgsfedqtdduvddrphgrrhhtrghgvgdrrhgvnhgrthgvrhdrfhhrpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepfhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopegtrdhstghhohgvnhgvrhhtsehtqdhonhhlihhnvgdruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhphihthhhonheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22902 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/198330345.77551379.1741962249309.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 25 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:24:09 +0100 (CET) X-Original-Message-ID: <198330345.77551379.1741962249309.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> X-Original-References: <8734ff28a2.fsf@page> <608783598.77286970.1741950523683.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <974218039.77306937.1741952574790.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <1120871038.77351934.1741954644346.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16785 > I've dropped using @builddep@ in general within the packages I'm > involved to achieve exactly what Andrey has written, I want to detect > broken or missing dependencies, broken tests by changed dependencies in > other depending packages. And don't want to get this hidden by packages > that are within @builddep@ that potential pull in the other then needed > packages. exactly > Using @builddep@ is mostly not useful for testing Python packages. does the python tools provide a way to get the runtime dependencies or the test dependencies of a package ? This would allow to automatize a lot'of our packaging job, upgrade etc.. > So yes, need to figure out which packages then you want to have listed > in d/t/control to make the tests pass. yes. I will use the doc snipset and customize it to have the right dependencies. But I am wondering if the best would not be to have something more declarative like the extra_dependencies in order to supersede the full dependencies instead of just adding more dependencies. Fred