Path: csiph.com!pasdenom.info!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andrey Rakhmatullin Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pybuild autopkgtest Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Mar 14 15:10:34 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.998 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tMChGhNN4Tpxe/MA" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22904 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Z9RG2a5rzOI_pww3@belkar.wrar.name Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 51 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 20:10:17 +0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <8734ff28a2.fsf@page> <608783598.77286970.1741950523683.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <974218039.77306937.1741952574790.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <1120871038.77351934.1741954644346.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <198330345.77551379.1741962249309.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16787 --tMChGhNN4Tpxe/MA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 03:24:09PM +0100, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: >> Using @builddep@ is mostly not useful for testing Python packages. > >does the python tools provide a way to get the runtime dependencies or the= test dependencies of a package ? Runtime sure, and we already use that. Test no, they aren't even specified= =20 in an uniform way in the upstream code (it could be e.g. a=20 tests/requirements.txt, one or several lists of deps in tox.ini or a=20 custom pip install line in the CI job definition, or nothing at all if=20 they run tests only locally and manually). >But I am wondering if the best would not be to have something more declara= tive like the extra_dependencies in order to supersede the full dependencie= s instead of just adding more dependencies. That makes sense. Or maybe it should get only the B-D annotated with=20 !nocheck if those exist. --=20 WBR, wRAR --tMChGhNN4Tpxe/MA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmfURtktFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh AUEP/1ml6jqEflgPP9OsfW/RGOolFy0QuI/FGoRsu6x7t/wEDhfQhfZ7cCV7//Kq ld47I6tWG4PhHcObiRmRiKNKE9FLbtK4+U2Zlr+MVqOwpydiCbr3Odff0Jy+4mVb VuY3HAvC/A2v2xBkSrboY06jz1CcqZbY1unyqzV8pww9xTCvBcrgmErjrL6QbCMJ vMcLJUijrNH2OR9w8jZL7KYaE//y8DogiCYKX1qzmhWzIkp+xur750jtJAvumQ/V p/oexNd9l/jPDl9CnGYZsPAQxK0JT+gm/EpFX7bNzzCmeWxC55ta8rSKiESF3Vf2 0hE/M+oUz6eYOC3TelO2UzuboYqumYSWoFsM7xT8v0gadclb/MnFEJs1RDQYGF0H fMMYxAjim3T8FDTcF9PRg6DsmcPP9rsdoNVlyuQ1RHlw4HgkFoBUarFYz0M2K56p XN8LTcUE8+Irzr9aGN5+g23CQ0YCYcxZNOGfR78ilu8TDFdWjaoS6XrGjI/o26ec o1UQ7YJBn8SpSTEFnkJv+Ts6j6k0cFZlecVEtip+j3X0sfHvOf+L64koOdbdnixU BlJF3zZwZrIIgtSbWcLvfkNhJdDVJc8nS9+QCEyTJvIOpD3AGjVTKP5N4UEXkiN0 u1qcRFHlI0lMLM17iEv6fOTE3gMW9OuoJdeZRSLX99QwDNV6 =CGzq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tMChGhNN4Tpxe/MA--