Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Arias Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ? Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 18 21:18:29 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-112.849 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.34, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_FINANCE10=0.5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bYSDJRRJGxkOXgA+" Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: eamanu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22829 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Z7T5CfnNtak_B8fV@debian Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 76 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python X-Original-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:18:01 -0300 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <26548.58731.571734.173421@rob.eddelbuettel.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16725 --bYSDJRRJGxkOXgA+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:54:19PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I have long maintained rpy2 (and rpy before) which provides a bridge from > Python to R (which I tend to care more for), and am on friendly terms with > its author. You can see my repo at salsa [1], it is pretty vanilla. >=20 > The upcoming upstream release will split into three packages, all in the = same > source repo [2]. I am a casual Python user, and not all into packaging th= ere > (source or for Debian). But I can wondering that this arrangement must ex= ist > elsewhere. Is there a good pattern I can borrow to build (and then instal= l ?) > rpy2-interfaces to then build (and install ?) rpy2-objects to then build > rpy2? > Seems very similar to basemap[0] [0] https://sources.debian.org/src/basemap/1.4.1-1/ > Python users see these as independent as they are in three different PyPI > packages. >=20 > Is there a best or recommended way to approach this? CCs welcome, I am n= ot > subscribed to debian-python. >=20 > Cheers, Dirk=20 >=20 >=20 > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/edd/rpy2 > [2] https://github.com/rpy2/rpy2 > --=20 > dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org --=20 cheers, Emmanuel Arias =E2=A2=80=E2=A3=B4=E2=A0=BE=E2=A0=BB=E2=A2=B6=E2=A3=A6=E2=A0=80 =E2=A3=BE=E2=A0=81=E2=A2=A0=E2=A0=92=E2=A0=80=E2=A3=BF=E2=A1=81 eamanu@de= bian.org =E2=A2=BF=E2=A1=84=E2=A0=98=E2=A0=B7=E2=A0=9A=E2=A0=8B=E2=A0=80 OpenPGP: = 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 =20 =E2=A0=88=E2=A0=B3=E2=A3=84 --bYSDJRRJGxkOXgA+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEE3lnVbvHK7ir4q61+p3sXeEcY/EFAme0+QkACgkQ+p3sXeEc Y/HT6xAAm7pOgSwg3TQyENtWaplZ1NpKilkWGNj8TwSsRX5tHZzfyjdy6GwhKRhh mkWJIM+9x6BBh14v3S9iVyFRjnPBRVB25TCcLgVNWNSq6iGhO8LXCRriz+lCWzjX HWpB2uNt4E146syaypy9O6s6LDOqI9tOTtDjhSl73Pi12VtyuomSmlGVwfvdnllj u4MIAwRaqQcvpsKPuGYclpTihnnsT/NAJaWoc/mk+xKsgP541SQIHjD56/BGnp4A xa0mzdf/PCtCHdG1Img7qPfUZL071l/FT+0enjp5BzanDfpxD+AZ86id6wASFg5F syjYff325TQljlENUSXRJZW9KLMNtwMJLVMJgIwV/d1KjDjN6EaDb1lWzjrOeFE1 zJaQo8KmDjQH89ObDJl9d9xuLPn6DLOKnzkgvmV79qsYWSJ0oZqCaYDcdqCKKvMI rBQ/Iy8j6WySX+wpLjzkkRY0+GWPBpNlFm36dEY/XjmgtODiAGLpLlPmJ6P4ccC8 j1lTE40zh90A0z5RoPZbDes5YeTxrqJrm5dDbySuvPIw6Wpn4jnZgAi/mnEEiVat nXzOMPpM7wN0ax1B9TrA7ET5zkLGjno1XsZ0gF0EIPMDBUEmt11+jd7HWkZ64uTG HLk001XvF7oH4d+FIee3qTJnZ5mN17NYT+XAja06jX7alBNEVEw= =lJoJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bYSDJRRJGxkOXgA+--