Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ananthu C V Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: python-xarray test failures Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: X-Original-To: Alastair McKinstry , Debian Science Team X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Apr 19 10:56:42 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.438, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Mail-Followup-To: Alastair McKinstry , Debian Science Team , Debian Python Team MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VvRv9OMHk/fvO+0b" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: The Debian Project X-Debian-User: weepingclown X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22981 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aAOBR5Y3ldkpVDe5@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 62 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Python Team X-Original-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:26:07 +0530 X-Original-Message-ID: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16858 --VvRv9OMHk/fvO+0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alastair, python-xarray currently reports several test failures[0]. If the package migrates to testing, it'd fix #1100293[1] which otherwise could cause a lot of AUTORM. The test failures are on the 32bit archs (armel, armhf, and i386), as well = as s390x. The failures on 32bit archs don't look serious to me as they look li= ke either intended for 64bit, or false negatives. In that regard, I have a pat= ch that'd disable those failing tests conditionally on 32bit archs[2]. I can't, however, push it to the team repo since it looks like the changes for the previous upload (as well as the debian tags for the last two uploads) was not pushed. If my patch seems reasonable to you, I can push it and do a team upload once you push your changes to the repo, or add an MR if you'd prefer= that. As for the test failures on s390x, that comes from uninstallable build-depe= nds which tracks down to magics++ not building on s390x[3] (and other archs). So either that needs to be fixed, or python-xarray and rdeps have to drop s390= x. [0] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xarray/ [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1100293 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/weepingclown/python-xarray/-/commit/23bb201a0a= c7ddab59e368cd342516d90ef8e47a [3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=3Dmagics%2B%2B --=20 Best, Ananthu --VvRv9OMHk/fvO+0b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEUtW9Dn1NsITjS1hl1KQc+t2yDbUFAmgDgUYACgkQ1KQc+t2y DbVT7BAArMWtq+1JMz9QJtq9Yr4BkfnIIdHbQgGVNpCHKsoueLWNdjLseJGleLIB v+Dq2Bmnf+Xq09SUQSyZ0bBF2jbY3x9gT+NaiJ3Qp8ZXHLdg1zeL/ZuhEYxea0/I y95WRIE1QjFFlce2HetoWRVnyW/CZWG1iDPpPCol8F2LHMb4aaqT/tRTldEMpTV5 ezifRa0MCrYSsdp3II1PfDmf9m6Ie9AC4Tgwgub9i+DkZBFmU8svN2sdpUf9Wog2 So8d4Jp5CaS1N2XAr11WytmMszVBZTnCmb1xNnX3ZkLj3cc5xVAikqPvkjvrdUF+ kvk5LuYDN7un4X2pcA1k9nfKo6BwWJiB2AvTEVXNISQxrZ/HcSCUiTdVlfeCS1Bq xDIgtYbE0++Xck414LCmbEUZ5TQ1sKyeVr2qX3Eq+fePjgcVAdLB/bkYVfduSDxW 6mG769FY2q7XuewQhK4KQjSNH9uDstxg413aSz7l2AnGcMf9Uzew+jnD+RTT3cwu EuoOWhSpZKIvjwBbBmgVHO7Lf8nLcUuEADX4X+JNS0jAO+PHsa/QvSvkafzJ3Y72 BklVNEFPVqu1Gps6AAwAEuhbLw2yA4gdeMc4XA97Gc8ihGYAtVeb12xSrb6gxlPJ XRFd6mA0sirz/H0SMAMQ/5EC5LnMKeY/aWS2Ua/2BG0cQlAzOkU= =T6Q4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VvRv9OMHk/fvO+0b--