Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Soren Stoutner Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Multi-Arch: same and WHEEL files Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 23:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jan 8 22:45:27 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.849 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.34, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Organization: Debian MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11655882.MucGe3eQFb"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Debian-User: soren X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22768 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/9648885.2WqB4rESCP@soren-desktop Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 69 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:45:07 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <9648885.2WqB4rESCP@soren-desktop> X-Original-References: <2052369.kXSN5OTJKJ@soren-desktop> <3a49016-ed33-4a10-de25-59ccda35631a@techie.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16673 --nextPart11655882.MucGe3eQFb Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Soren Stoutner To: Debian Python Subject: Re: Multi-Arch: same and WHEEL files Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:45:07 -0700 Message-ID: <9648885.2WqB4rESCP@soren-desktop> Organization: Debian In-Reply-To: <3a49016-ed33-4a10-de25-59ccda35631a@techie.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:36:18=E2=80=AFPM MST Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > Python3-hid was marked `Multi-Arch: same` by a previous maintainer.=20 > > Recently, tracker.debian.org warned that there is an issue because the > > WHEEL file is different in each package. > >=20 > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-hidapi > >=20 > > The differences are in the `tag` field in the WHEEL file. For example, > > amd64 > > has: > >=20 > > Tag: cp312-cp312-linux_x86_64 > >=20 > > While arm64 has: > >=20 > > Tag: cp312-cp312-linux_aarch64 > >=20 > > What is the recommended way to deal with this?\ > >=20 > > 1. Should the package not be marked `Multi-Arch: same`? > >=20 > > 2. Should I prevent the binary package from shipping the WHEEL file? > >=20 > > 3. Is there some other recommendation? >=20 > It seems like this package probably should just not be marked Multi-Arch: > same. The WHEEL file is likely important metadata. Thank you for the advice. I have done so. =2D-=20 Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org --nextPart11655882.MucGe3eQFb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmd+//MACgkQwufLJ66w tgOq8RAAkRMZyClAqC8PJayGmtbeC3eff+JDoyE2VowD5fNapPVzYwfCKNkM5n/W hHXMUeaZMYaVvg0p1DUYqjW3ImhRJPigGdC9AWNWTbbkOQ+LkDf1jfbdikMyPB3e Jb6IQZFg11GUttWnPY6J2oaznI/OyzDK2SuIDuQBDGCYActR4IMSGaLuYDBmShMD /fWO5fePwihVlPVmAtTfRnPUF6b5P3myJjYgTRBKP6mJEWC25JpwflLsQL+YKpuZ 07XgVTP6UG5xlK8i6y5uhJTTW3quFp2jussDnbFqCq0Vx6AwuzRbMqk+1BCbHmIa sD/sPlnj1wgttjBeVp2xgK2nzFyBxl2I6niwoW62c1RAUuKywRA5RB1AsADQxKf/ cui/ZBsl20yNlwyuQqpuP0lRDvlgJiVqZQccDvqWJRFjnCU89PnaxeO6x/fGw3j5 qsG3wlHP4iOOBEbw3yenCuV8qPuzmo3+Tl6jDYYWTlfb+2Tl8NGd3AMEXZVBhU0g vp7XqjlLXirCrDMye39Kc5ThT7199TPlACsjWM5RdMc5IM/9w7ZO8JNxh/Dyw5yR FoZDZl7oAOGe/Gs8gDJ9/DsoskLC5FmbkZcnU5ao/PkU68YLZzqkmn6pi+vlnu6/ uVIiqLVjGgEhN4x4DVDJeyDDehOd223P8pr9dk/50BsfxTHiVBI= =0uxo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11655882.MucGe3eQFb--