Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Soren Stoutner Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#998151: python-trezor: incorrect binary package name, python3-trezor should be python3-trezorlib Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 20:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 4 18:39:10 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.699 Reply-To: Soren Stoutner , 998151@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Python Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 998151 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:python-trezor X-Debian-Pr-Source: python-trezor Organization: Debian MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2981969.GB4zBMHdMN"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Debian-User: soren X-Crossassassin-Score: 2 X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1861442 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 70 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Python X-Original-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:34:14 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <5135466.egGhzXvQ2J@soren-desktop> X-Original-References: <2293296.RJCQjk8tL4@soren-desktop> <163564433318.818565.9203419061094757269.reportbug@zion.matrix.int> <163564433318.818565.9203419061094757269.reportbug@zion.matrix.int> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1215189 linux.debian.maint.python:16323 --nextPart2981969.GB4zBMHdMN Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Soren Stoutner To: 998151-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 998151@bugs.debian.org Cc: Debian Python Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:34:14 -0700 Message-ID: <5135466.egGhzXvQ2J@soren-desktop> Organization: Debian In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Control: tags -1 moreinfo Carsten, On Friday, October 4, 2024 11:18:04 AM MST Carsten Schoenert wrote: > the Python policy hasn't got updates and adjustments since years, a lot > of things are a bit outdated e.g. how to handle Python2 based packages. >=20 > The part Sandro was referring to is =C2=A74.3 > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/#module-packag= e-nam > es >=20 > This isn't a rule of MUST, it's SHOULD and this is good. I think this > package is a good example why. > User will not search for python3-trezorlib because the upstream name is > trezor. The module name is basically important for programmers because > they need to know which module they need to use and therefore include. Thank you for the detailed explanation. I am inclined to follow your advic= e=20 and leave the package names as is. Sandro, As you were the original filer of the bug, I want to give you a chance to=20 respond if you still feel that renaming the binary package is appropriate. = If=20 I don=E2=80=99t hear from you in a reasonable amount of time I will close t= he bug=20 report. =2D-=20 Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org --nextPart2981969.GB4zBMHdMN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmcANSYACgkQwufLJ66w tgM2YhAAm5OmQLND2mQ0JATYI+G45JkO03vFMhR/AsHaaaFtpM41tJSGl5gwJhoD GSp6I31Xadzq9mxQGxjiRa+MUGNZjrgo6a9sTl+H5NpKeIijj2TsxG712OwZSpeo HIgaFIrGc2jqVknXjzZxE33NjWeZxrnUOQQHrFFwZBd6WVPc3BfAVneOwb2YhZf8 cNurZ0pcxmp0ecdjcApRDi6XyXl04PbH/sGL1CrRhJH+i7HYlYRDANliw3fHPAK1 75sXN27fizS9V1zkod5TAg7DdlmzlTVRiZXrwi4VCy2h80YKrHprhDaY+moyOR7y M5BqUEy6PM4Zg8KaHIJkhkXGSWsO20RpgzdEtOBWlK6TmjAZb6MTVWk95QfCZEuT Q50sr2WwI7iVk7UE7ChqL+4F6rPEbiFn/AcqfZKVb5MiaqcUekrf/yED9tHGoin/ xaCTN/mGKO2Hx4JA9L82FyBpxEHnNXBN2CIFcTCWMUwb+8gVbMKbUtBRgzc5yJ8+ RwZrRV6a9Q2qUBOJmPo/li/X+hr08uzv0dsanvM6wUvigIlc6/eAOBqJOfpQfp7j TnRm00x69nk+JSXXzfnRFWUqW+kLxJYJ36dHOsWO12Gm2dnFdE3fI/6UbCi54sZk fXgKxe73/HLvgSMbXLiuf5L6F+Cpi7B+WQjec891jKJ5ymTZe3o= =PCoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2981969.GB4zBMHdMN--