Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16307
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Salvo Tomaselli <ltworf@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg |
| Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2024 23:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Jswrf-g28h-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Sep 30 21:48:58 2024 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ltworf@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| Organization | debian |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7496362.DvuYhMxLoT"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Debian-User | ltworf |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22368 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/14198883.O9o76ZdvQC@galatea |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 51 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2024 23:48:38 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <14198883.O9o76ZdvQC@galatea> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16307 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello,
I just saw this conversation
https://discuss.python.org/t/pre-pep-discussion-stop-providing-gpg-signatures-for-cpython-artifacts/65058
Perhaps someone more expert than me at not making flamewars would like to
intervene?
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
-- Galileo Galilei
https://ltworf.codeberg.page/
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Salvo Tomaselli <ltworf@debian.org> - 2024-09-30 23:50 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Salvo Tomaselli <ltworf@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 00:20 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 02:00 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-10-03 17:30 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-10-03 20:30 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-10-03 22:30 +0200
Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-10-04 20:30 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Mathias Behrle <mbehrle@debian.org> - 2024-10-04 21:30 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2024-10-05 03:40 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-10-05 06:10 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-10-05 10:30 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-10-05 12:40 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 00:30 +0200
csiph-web