Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andrey Rakhmatullin Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: [Help] New package python-loky build time test times out Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 26 09:59:19 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.898 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l3fQ3FcH+lJoGaDy" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22725 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Z20o5S8kEJoOIMsY@belkar.wrar.name Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 59 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:59:01 +0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <4226e68c154e1fdf36e291b5d95d95fd@posteo.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16631 --l3fQ3FcH+lJoGaDy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 08:48:54AM +0000, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote: > > https://github.com/search?q=3Drepo%3Acogent3%2Fcogent3%20loky&type=3Dco= de >=20 > Sending URLs only is quit annoying to all other list members and not an > answer. *shrug* > I know the details and that there are reasons why this package depend on = the > other. > But IMHO the reasons are not heavy enough to burn resources of Debian > packagers. > As upstream I would just integrate that codebase into my own, As an upstream I would never "integrate" a several thousands SLoC package, properly written, tested and maintained one, into my own project just to have 1 less dependency. This sounds very wrong to me. And I wouldn't do that "not to burn resources of Debian packagers", in any case. Saying this as a DD. Having to package dependencies is normal. > or open a > ticket at Jupyter to get rid of that restriction causing that dependency. Assuming it's possible, it could be done in parallel. --=20 WBR, wRAR --l3fQ3FcH+lJoGaDy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmdtKOUtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh cHEP/2sr45h2zIrkI6DOuC9PFJRXndMU0oPBa3Td6xl8MbwtiUM6ukYdsuUq/ZWN 2524DQv4RTWti3qB1P13JfpteyqktfbxIwn1T3kvMp/FLNofi3iSEXl1aF7GFvr9 n6VovqKaXYLZxpkbiI0sAFAt1mdIgW1QpwvaNlU9fFeiC66xnlW2sl3vgSfFJ2kg 18w6N5EzILMZhj/IsgiN+wtu7BAnLHM3z6/dHGO3P5FqRm2+qH+0N6fcMjHjbS1Z Xnearm77zJf6iRlJSJY40KFvM8y249LhFZhuONcZ5WhrIyTm0X2/IAxUd1Ggls/P 1GU0XVxIgyEgNmqsjzAXoNQpiv3Z8jD+SNsKQ2/vWvd2TW5F39qiCzTG3pvQlBFj 6ZMB+z/HgzJgwYT+uFhs7d0xnGmCmoeKMhNffTvDqCGreSxeYQh8SOSmlqrOOIBP z8LCV1+Tq4TgVqSApYwtXWY7qx9peK//2wRJRvXYL007NvR+2CEjqtmId9qFq1zv ihiXg1Suh+QFf1CqFDofpW5t/LIMsjbj5woMIxPYDb8lXvH4E1/yNqJIizHjKIIJ WXkExB0Wu/7ySteVmgdl1b8fN6pXMhVUxO/g94nubeurusEKzXE7OjkXG2+qEmft Jf499jvKJ1UWR9ZfbyJZIKvfUHZc1IEjfTDvclhdo4UzSJHg =kTkM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l3fQ3FcH+lJoGaDy--