Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andrey Rakhmatullin Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: [Help] New package python-loky build time test times out Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 21:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Dec 25 19:56:38 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.998 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rRNZq/jfhkD5VwW3" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22716 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Z2xjZfWQL_D-BuIP@belkar.wrar.name Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 60 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 00:56:21 +0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <4226e68c154e1fdf36e291b5d95d95fd@posteo.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16623 --rRNZq/jfhkD5VwW3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 07:37:51PM +0000, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am a Python developer and upstream maintainer. > I am not much experience when it comes to distro packaging. > This is just an example of a case I often do observe. And I always ask > myself why this happens. >=20 > Am 25.12.2024 18:47 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > the new version of python-cogent needs python-loky[1] >=20 > I checked both package and do not understand why python-loky exist. It is= a > mini package with less benefit. Why does Debian burn resources in packagi= ng > things like this. I would ask python-cogent to remove that dependency > instead of create a package for it. As upstream maintainer I would not da= re > to have dependencies like this in my project and bother distro maintainers > with it. >=20 > I am assuming this package will be orphaned in the near future. >=20 > I am asking the upstream maintainer for a justification about this > dependency: > https://github.com/search?q=3Drepo%3Acogent3%2Fcogent3%20loky&type=3Dcode --=20 WBR, wRAR --rRNZq/jfhkD5VwW3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmdsY2UtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh lJAQAJzqmGM/x8EIy/dJuWKhUWuKMF3h8DXt94532gvA89ZC2klY8OK479Pats7m LDgqtvoPHsavNAt2nrsG+0n6LTRSl1qAqcegE2xmemjOAGwE1BD9SDw6rw3evPnG 11XCiLooViUZN/bsWQydm/0gV1l/KULW50qJVIhHt4rJNjRHjZXfnw0P7WzYT6Se DK/Ggix35d1e3UBxjyzvk95Xvw74mpZwRsIVG7gGdEXfM03EekeQfmU+UFfZklWl WxCpcyIlOv9kQUrpN7A9crYNuywImdjTvczey9bl1hZOp0iMizbIxL5zoED6uMcX 832N9GbiW0z/AMdygUHCfEKZH0pWli5Uqz078hCND1up9fWYsXgtxqLEqBF11muk fRVEllsiT0bFJoxZakOJGXLW1H4zCaOaHglE3QF9oPYFZYvvUbIlGJeeGXixcX2C SLQXaz5ke2GW6amxvA9wnt7dBrrXX/UiQlJ9O+Fr0C10JxYJs5iGBot6Tfk01GKD 0ZecVEtCBVyeQ8K0HfyzX4Ohrq1AmLFjuXJiASg6QKHqMhm3UdO68wggrSXLDSg2 zrBQY5Y1eUlsGAgXWNQqNYlgF7xgSMbzPw4AUYXHUqHSSUg+Pb4HOSaw1g7W+1wV r8xAUVU/EDcQigq32UlHzeFk7L5d0g+wkMJwTUcVDhvFmHzS =4VTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rRNZq/jfhkD5VwW3--