Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy?
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:00:01 +0100
Message-ID: <JQafT-dOFA-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <JP4Pf-d7mR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPm9r-dijr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPriO-dloo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPFOO-dvqP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JPTI5-dEB8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Thu Dec  5 02:51:09 2024
Old-Return-Path: <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.198 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail
X-Pm-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22611
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87mshaoo0r.fsf@melete.silentflame.com
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 23
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org,  notmuch@notmuchmail.org, mailscripts@packages.debian.org,  Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 10:35:16 +0800
X-Original-Message-ID: <87mshaoo0r.fsf@melete.silentflame.com>
X-Original-References: <875xo2u70p.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87ed2pu64q.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87v7w1qysu.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87y10wsk2d.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87ser3st5v.fsf@debian-hx90.lan>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16526

Hello,

On Wed 04 Dec 2024 at 01:18am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:

> Looks like this has nothing to do with Python version but gpgme: I have
> tested with a snapshot of gpgme1.0 version 1.18.0-6+b1 and everything
> works; upgrading to version 1.23.2-5 and the tests start to show the
> same errors.  I have been trying to see what has changed from gpgme side
> but so far nothing conclusive yet.
>
> On the other hand, python-pgpy may be working fine as all failures in
> the tests are caused by using the gpgme python binding, which somehow
> doesn't like the PGP signed message generated by python-pgpy anymore.

So the bug has nothing to do with the python 3.13 transition, in fact?

I think that means its severity should be changed.

I guess you're not sure yet whether or not it should be reassigned to
pgpme?

-- 
Sean Whitton