Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 04:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Dec 3 02:51:10 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22602 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87v7w1qysu.fsf@melete.silentflame.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 21 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org, mailscripts@packages.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor X-Original-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 10:34:57 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <87v7w1qysu.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> X-Original-References: <875xo2u70p.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87ed2pu64q.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16517 Hello Xiyue, On Mon 02 Dec 2024 at 01:28pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote: > I have made a MR[1] including a few quick fixes for the RC bugs, in hope > that they are acceptable for another NMU to unblock this package and its > dependencies. PTAL. Thanks! > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pgpy/-/merge_requests/2 Thank you very much for taking a look at this one. I'm a bit queasy about just disabling the failing tests. Do we have reason to believe that pgpy is not actually broken with Python 3.13? In other words, what makes you think that it's just the tests that are broken, not the program? Thanks. -- Sean Whitton