Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Peter Wienemann Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Nov 11 19:10:39 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.849 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.34, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Debian-User: wiene X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22517 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/9083b620-0b1a-425d-8896-11dbf9770837@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 62 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:09:59 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <9083b620-0b1a-425d-8896-11dbf9770837@debian.org> X-Original-References: <059e32a6-6909-48e9-aeb9-22cd31013db8@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16443 Hi Alexandru, On 2024-11-10 19:23:29, Alexandru Mihail wrote: >> d/control >> > Done at present both the source package and the binary package are called "psrecord". Looking at [0] my understanding is that the recent package name discussion concluded with source package name: psrecord binary package name: python3-psrecord Please correct me if I overlooked something. Somewhat related: I still feel uncertain what is the best matching section for this package: "devel", "utils" or "python" (cf. [1])? I leave the decision to you. [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/10/msg00104.html [1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable/ >> d/copyright >> ----------- > Done >> >> In the "License: BSD-2-clause" stanza, the "All rights reserved." >> line >> is missing. > I reread the BSD license, and what other packages have in copyright.. I > can't find the line you're talking about, could you tell me where the > line should be ? I am referring to this line: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/psrecord/-/blob/471390a544f149afcaa20cf1cad5c9f92c95c744/LICENSE#L2 > I feel I'm getting close to upload ready for this, any extra comments > from anyone would be welcome ! If nothing else comes up, I'm going > forward and requesting an upload from anyone who has the time to do so. Trying to build the package using the present repository contents, I get a build failure: $ gbp buildpackage [...] gbp:error: Cannot find pristine tar commit for archive 'psrecord_1.4.orig.tar.gz' $ pristine-tar list python-psrecord_1.4.orig.tar.gz > (BTW, I'm stuck with the main [default] branch on the psrecord repo, I > still can't figure out how to unprotect it and delete ( I think someone > with admin powers has to do that, it's been discussed here before ) I changed the default branch to "debian/master" and protected it. I guess you should be able to delete the "main" branch now. Best regards, Peter