Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Blair Noctis Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 2 12:27:33 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SUBENDNUM=2] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=n@sail.ng; keydata= xjMEX+ahWhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAQO9repiHmYansog+ig8UxWOKpVtEeNf9+1uRaqsjm2fN GEJsYWlyIE5vY3RpcyA8bkBzYWlsLm5nPsKZBBMWCgBBAhsjBQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYCAwEA Ah4BAheAAhkBFiEEWdhNRMzQ6CZHrtopwh2a1COjlycFAmZNx6kFCQeNc2kACgkQwh2a1COj lyeofwEAqKp4U6d8EGrZ/PpUEpAitUPUI5xtidp679eIp8VZrPsBALXSFhEluTJiT4xx7kKx iV19IPGsYguVgZ2mohUzQjYHzjgEZk37VxIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQFYEvQe+5IjB0CLNvW/b SW5pSmbLFS87lEU5ha5CaKoaAwEIB8J+BBgWCgAmFiEEWdhNRMzQ6CZHrtopwh2a1COjlycF AmZN+1cCGwwFCQEl/oAACgkQwh2a1COjlyfscAD+L8rPy6fUNLY7Xe3/nlfibfAWwV7w79Ut 29e4iqoAojABAPD+SaH1S2dHNcYQvt/Wd/E7Lh+1HDddq+SgWjmemw4B Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------DYELhKeAST7nNNQ0nYBbuvQ5" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22198 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20223226-f811-4f30-8c84-8e588c04451a@sail.ng Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 58 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 20:27:09 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <20223226-f811-4f30-8c84-8e588c04451a@sail.ng> X-Original-References: <667baffb-2372-4d2e-a033-440d1d687074@debian.org> <0776385d-816a-4f91-8b32-06f4f64585da@sail.ng> <6228540.DvuYhMxLoT@galatea> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16159 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------DYELhKeAST7nNNQ0nYBbuvQ5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------rJnUdh2kKgZ25b26BAssyrku"; protected-headers="v1" From: Blair Noctis To: Salvo Tomaselli Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Message-ID: <20223226-f811-4f30-8c84-8e588c04451a@sail.ng> Subject: Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 References: <667baffb-2372-4d2e-a033-440d1d687074@debian.org> <0776385d-816a-4f91-8b32-06f4f64585da@sail.ng> <6228540.DvuYhMxLoT@galatea> In-Reply-To: <6228540.DvuYhMxLoT@galatea> --------------rJnUdh2kKgZ25b26BAssyrku Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/08/2024 20:14, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: >> Package authors should have had plenty of time to have this information >> propagated to them and migrate. > > In general, stuff that works doesn't receive many updates. Yes, in fact I quite like the concept of "feature-complete passive maintenance". However, it doesn't conflict with updating with upstream/language. > And thinght might be > abandoned upstream but still work fine and be used as dependencies for other > things. Covered in another email: >> If we for example need to patch 10 dead-upstream projects > > which means the maintainer is now responsible for keeping it up to date. > Including following Python upgrades and PEPs. -- Sdrager, Blair Noctis --------------rJnUdh2kKgZ25b26BAssyrku-- --------------DYELhKeAST7nNNQ0nYBbuvQ5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQScTWEJ927Sl0a/hB7sV97Kb1Pv6QUCZqzQngAKCRDsV97Kb1Pv 6ZBRAP49usUMKyfT+wfFiA2wBYnkUgpK0hNLC8OgmY2VMKMZzQEAjIycw3nUsgQT rCHIap4Z6XFHIzpM1CZUZ52CaJrX3wk= =wNFa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------DYELhKeAST7nNNQ0nYBbuvQ5--