Path: csiph.com!pasdenom.info!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Blair Noctis Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 12:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Alexandre Detiste X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 2 10:26:14 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SUBENDNUM=2] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=n@sail.ng; keydata= xjMEX+ahWhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAQO9repiHmYansog+ig8UxWOKpVtEeNf9+1uRaqsjm2fN GEJsYWlyIE5vY3RpcyA8bkBzYWlsLm5nPsKZBBMWCgBBAhsjBQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYCAwEA Ah4BAheAAhkBFiEEWdhNRMzQ6CZHrtopwh2a1COjlycFAmZNx6kFCQeNc2kACgkQwh2a1COj lyeofwEAqKp4U6d8EGrZ/PpUEpAitUPUI5xtidp679eIp8VZrPsBALXSFhEluTJiT4xx7kKx iV19IPGsYguVgZ2mohUzQjYHzjgEZk37VxIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQFYEvQe+5IjB0CLNvW/b SW5pSmbLFS87lEU5ha5CaKoaAwEIB8J+BBgWCgAmFiEEWdhNRMzQ6CZHrtopwh2a1COjlycF AmZN+1cCGwwFCQEl/oAACgkQwh2a1COjlyfscAD+L8rPy6fUNLY7Xe3/nlfibfAWwV7w79Ut 29e4iqoAojABAPD+SaH1S2dHNcYQvt/Wd/E7Lh+1HDddq+SgWjmemw4B Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------aIAmpycubH5sWLe5cTCqCFbE" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/22190 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/dca43ebc-bcbe-4d30-9581-09f6bf613480@sail.ng Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 60 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:25:28 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <667baffb-2372-4d2e-a033-440d1d687074@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16152 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------aIAmpycubH5sWLe5cTCqCFbE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7v0YXwbb6OOpLBcjulN6vF0U"; protected-headers="v1" From: Blair Noctis To: Alexandre Detiste Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Alternative libraries for PEP-594 References: <667baffb-2372-4d2e-a033-440d1d687074@debian.org> In-Reply-To: --------------7v0YXwbb6OOpLBcjulN6vF0U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/08/2024 16:21, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Hi, > > I will need some "zombie-telnetlib" (so exactly the same API as > existing telnetlib) > because I maintain proprietary .deb (not "Debian packages") that need > to be installable without rebuild on Buster, Bookworm & Trixie. It's just /usr/lib/python3.12/telnetlib.py. You can probably copy it to your "proprietary" .deb and continue using it. > I understand that "telnetlib3" / "exscript" are 'better/newer' API but > that does not fit the need. Hopefully the need can be fulfilled by a clever rewrite and/or an external library. > Debian could also benefit from this zombie-telnetlib. How? On the other hand, it would allow packages to continue relying on a thing expunged from upstream, a maintenance burden for both Debian and upstream. -- Sdrager, Blair Noctis --------------7v0YXwbb6OOpLBcjulN6vF0U-- --------------aIAmpycubH5sWLe5cTCqCFbE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQScTWEJ927Sl0a/hB7sV97Kb1Pv6QUCZqy0GAAKCRDsV97Kb1Pv 6VH2AP49cLF6Zlnd0h1RLwcZrh8ahygG4KVmr9TH6TKz5LLESQD+NUSbJm0zVF/J PKkUenF1OU0BC11a1zhrM6Na/9jcaAE= =9uzT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------aIAmpycubH5sWLe5cTCqCFbE--