Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Alexandre Detiste Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Apr 22 07:44:52 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy108RtBVvA1zyOy1Zwxq4MAqlBrjUWwahHZyp7RiCeqx6ezQii i7+cllmg9RLz0y6okNPdTazBbL0tpAF4gL5HvXfqrVaUWUO1QTB1nAfNuYfSkUEbXG+hahILmjd Er+aZJcd1VWIoGc5Fgx5mBFao5lLXuCnC X-Google-SMTP-Source: AGHT+IG5KaJCZQ8yTvcBw48ultBTmcAtyEkesk1qrXtOE+5v/QJlWa5a20KoP/e++V8pwPxxwP5GiE7GKc5YX9iHITU= X-Received: by 2002:a25:fc04:0:b0:dcd:63f8:ba32 with SMTP id v4-20020a25fc04000000b00dcd63f8ba32mr7282148ybd.65.1713771865475; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:44:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004494f70616aa9b1c" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/21804 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CADsTwjK9Ka9seUhNp1Avvr1-=TRcpkGqnLhfj=K5jxiTLxQncw@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 76 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Python X-Original-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:44:14 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <871q77fxdd.fsf@fama.lan> <877cgq9bee.fsf@fama.lan> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15778 --0000000000004494f70616aa9b1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I ll check back home, but it's most likely I was waiting for SQLAlchemy 2.xx. I know for share that one package does wait for SA 2.xx but can t remember which one. > It looks like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now? Sure Le lun. 22 avr. 2024, 08:09, Martin a =C3=A9crit : > On 2024-04-15 11:38, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > > Le lun. 15 avr. 2024 =C3=A0 11:20, Thomas Goirand a = =C3=A9crit : > >> The rest of: > >> - pymodbus > >> > >> I don't even know what they do. > > > > Life is better when one does not have to deal with modbus :-) > > Yes! > > > This package is outdated and need a refresh. > > As I see, you already pushed a new upstream to git in January/February, > but did not yet upload the package. Are there any blockers? It looks > like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now? > --0000000000004494f70616aa9b1c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I ll check back home, but it's most likely I was waiting for SQLAlch= emy 2.xx.

I know for sha= re that one package does wait for SA 2.xx but can t remember which one.

> It looks
like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now?

Sure

=

Le lun. 22 avr. 2024, 08:09, Martin <debacle@debian.org> a =C3=A9crit= =C2=A0:
On 2024-04-15 11:38, Alexan= dre Detiste wrote:
> Le lun. 15 avr. 2024 =C3=A0 11:20, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org= > a =C3=A9crit :
>> The rest of:
>> - pymodbus
>>
>> I don't even know what they do.
>
> Life is better when one does not have to deal with modbus :-)

Yes!

> This package is outdated and need a refresh.

As I see, you already pushed a new upstream to git in January/February,
but did not yet upload the package. Are there any blockers? It looks
like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now?
--0000000000004494f70616aa9b1c--