Path: csiph.com!news.neodome.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Feb 28 14:38:10 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.81 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/21502 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Zd9FO2xMKEbw3jyf@an3as.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 20 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:37:47 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <80455cbe-cc13-4240-8517-f9ba0512c32e@debian.org> <93E5EE46-6619-4584-B28E-1D4B6A3AB389@kitterman.com> <13029673-f563-4667-9f2a-c5e9e5fb1afe@debian.org> <05C0AB9D-651C-43A0-83CA-01CD31013A94@kitterman.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15520 Hi Scott, Am Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:44:07AM +0000 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > This makes more sense to me. It is completely understandable that how things are communicated affects how people feel about them. This is a difficult thing to get right. I have experienced similar demotivating conversations in Debian myself. Seems everybody who has contributed to Debian some time was facing this. > Everyone in Debian is already bound by the code of conduct already, so it seems redundant to add it here again. While I agree with the principle you are trying to address, I think this change unnecessarily clutters the DPT document and we should not make it. I have no really strong opinion about this. I had the cluttering point in mind when I moved this paragraph right to the end. I agree that it is redundant to some extend. Sometimes saying things repeatedly does not harm but I would not strongly insist on this change. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de