Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: newer dask release Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:10:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jun 17 18:00:14 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.52 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mTr6zygJYgysaGMj" Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: emollier X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/21986 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZnB5nOf-5-wTs3T-@fusion.emlwks999.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 58 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:59:56 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <4074f18a7e9cefde7200a90ebdc8315608062491.camel@ghic.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15950 --mTr6zygJYgysaGMj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Julian, Julian Gilbey, on 2024-06-17: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 10:57:22PM +0200, =C3=89tienne Mollier wrote: > > Thank you for your help with dask documentation, took time to > > polish what I could and uploaded dask. dask.distributed upload > > is coming soon, just the time for the last pass of local build > > and tests to finish. > >=20 > > Have a nice day, :) >=20 > Hi =C3=89tienne, >=20 > Unfortunately, the new dask.distributed FTBFS: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=3Ddask.distributed Hmm, I see, it looks like my "isolation" by erasing resov.conf is just insufficient to catch attempts to make direct use of IP addresses. I retried with an unshare chroot, and I already start seeing the same test items failing. This prompted me to adjust my configuration to forcefully use my lingering unshare a bit more often. Thanks for the follow up! Have a nice day, :) --=20 .''`. =C3=89tienne Mollier : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/7, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Rush - Fly By Night --mTr6zygJYgysaGMj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEj5GyJ8fW8rGUjII2eTz2fo8NEdoFAmZweZwACgkQeTz2fo8N Edo0RQ//XZ9EomVxtE+fZiKEZQt2xGV/mV7+kQeDyHCrsu+VSibFpx/KJ63lhpbg OC6O/Syr4xPpcu6Qw8tG5nZ4Rwcfa2jM/+LSUkvkwpd/2YV9Amv6svztAFz6YPsV q/nrkcZ0j3K2BY50W/9v4lebJnwXN5psmdaDS/q3YpCLHttkjdKx+p2ihmia5+qO rlt7vDp9jmdeIcAtyRhO9rjdiIkxRTUe88fmdkwdxDV5hHe0KHResFKCJ8ESvqyz PIJgrCTJLDQtUveyIwc2Gcv3jhMbl+1QqMS7aETIahfZmW8d+SpZkbDU/sDZ2BIH cFVDBoflOSUdsndNsRBqnFJly6SuA+/6G4F9gSauiwRkVjYKo+8IPRwLQ81FURSk aHa8Ydc9Sf9ZkRoAYvEMCk7PWQH/Tx3KLim/JqVkdC8EC34xAG0nhJR7jreGbxVd vRgnTY7RV1MsQVp6iOVXk8opitQqEJlW4EB9lGIp0NFsapTjUgT2lPIknqnY62Zc z4W1dhLkW+4AhY2GnidtTtZDmhujPPHpNvY8JThEGDHuTjlbpjB6Zfipq6AkgcQp ibt6clvxmnV0BCCE801jj4tJdqvHULz5CTLCYLUmECR2ZP3Cujsq4pALLz7CJOyf BJCEqKbsivSoiZi03ife4cHAA05NUW5lHQWGBvb/o4qWoVGA0dU= =J827 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mTr6zygJYgysaGMj--