Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Julian Gilbey Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Breaking changes in pytest 8 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 08:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jan 26 07:30:05 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/21400 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZbNfaEEO777G-JqS@d-and-j.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 48 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 07:29:44 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15438 Hi Timo, And the transition is now complete :-) Best wishes, Julian On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:45:04PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi Timo, > > Please can we hold back on uploading pytest 8 to unstable until the > current Python 3.12 transition is complete? It is entirely possible > that several of the packages that currently break with pytest 8 > already have newer upstream versions that address these issues, but > it's probably not wise to mix that in with the current transition. > > Best wishes, > > Julian > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 11:32:29PM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently uploaded the pre-release pytest 8.0.0~rc1 to experimental as an > > early warning for the breaking changes which typically happen on major > > version bumps. > > > > I've attached a dd-list of packages which exhibit autopkgtest regressions > > [1], with the intent of MBF'ing (with separate announcement) once pytest 8 > > is released. > > > > Typically, packages will fail if they > > - have deprecation warnings of type PytestRemovedIn8Warning, or > > - assume a particular pytest stdout/stderr output which might have > > changed, or > > - rely on the precise order in which pytest collects tests, especially the > > behavior of the pytest.Package collector. > > > > Please refer to the upstream changelog [2] for a complete list of breaking > > changes. > > > > > > Cheers > > Timo > > > > [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=pytest > > [2] https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/changelog.html