Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Lucas Nussbaum Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 31 12:27:51 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: lucas X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/21215 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZUDyqhB6FQ9CuZmL@grub.nussbaum.fr Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 25 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Python X-Original-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:27:22 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <02536429-92f1-40cd-98c2-f88b330d6bb2@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15280 Hi Thomas, On 31/10/23 at 13:08 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not really sure what's going on, but I saw many packages marked as RC > buggy with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20, however, both are still in > Experimental, not in Unstable. I tried rebuilding those, and in built fine. > I therefore closed the bugs. > > I'm not sure if I was right doing so, and what's the intention behind > bumping severity to serious. Is this for preparing before the upload of > sphinx+docutils to unstable? If so, I would strongly suggest explaining this > in bug entries, stating the intention is to upload sphinx and docutils very > soon. Otherwise, like me, someone may wrongly close the bugs after a > successful rebuild. See this message: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042585;msg=7 and this comment from Dmitry Shachnev: # Dear Maintainers, I am going to upload Sphinx 7.2.6 to unstable next weekend. # That will make these packages FTBFS in sid, which is a release-critical bug. # The new docutils will be uploaded after Sphinx migrates to testing. Lucas