Path: csiph.com!news.neodome.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Adam_C=c3=a9cile?= <acecile@le-vert.net>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: Transitionning to the lextudio pysnmp / pyasn1 ecosystem
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:10:01 +0200
Message-ID: <HfC5P-9YSE-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <HebAJ-96Dm-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Tue Sep 19 06:02:40 2023
Old-Return-Path: <acecile@le-vert.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.673 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.473] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21139
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/bc75d7d2-9e8a-1e08-52a3-cab23d3988d6@le-vert.net
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 42
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:01:47 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: <bc75d7d2-9e8a-1e08-52a3-cab23d3988d6@le-vert.net>
X-Original-References: <13aae4ad-229f-9f2d-0767-16d18a069dc1@debian.org>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15207

On 9/15/23 09:38, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you may know, the upstream author for pysnmp passed away last year. 
> As a result, the whole suite was forked by "lextudio". I packaged it, 
> and the result is this list of source packages:
>
> python-pyasn1-lextudio
> python-pyasn1-modules-lextudio
> python-pysmi-lextudio
> python-pysnmp-lextudio
>
> Appart from the OpenStack packages, here's the list of reverse 
> dependencies for the old python3-pysnmp4 binary package:
>
> * patator
> * pdudaemon
> * pysmi
> * snimpy
> * changeme
> * python3-snimpy
> * python3-pysnmp4-apps
> * python3-pysnmp4-mibs
> * snmpsim
>
> My plan is to file bugs against these packages, asking to transition 
> to the newer packages. We're just below the threshold for asking 
> debian-devel about mass bug-filling, so I figured out I would only 
> send a mail to the Python list. Do you guys approve my plan? Should we 
> make transition dummy packages?
>
> Also to Adam Cécile: can you make your pull request against the new 
> Salsa repository?

Hello,

Regarding my lexstudio patch to fix double awaitable bug ?

>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)